Prospective analysis of office-based hysteroscopic sterilization

被引:52
作者
Levie, MD [1 ]
Chudnoff, SG [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
hysteroscopy; sterilization; essure; office;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2005.11.010
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of performing the Essure hysteroscopic sterilization in an office-based setting. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: University out-patient office. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing permanent sterilization in our outpatient office who opted for hysteroscopic sterilization were included. INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopic placement of the Essure device in an office-based setting with only non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs and paracervical block. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multiple data points were collected on each patient including demographic data, specific procedural information, and 12-week hysterosalpingogram data. Most of our patients were Hispanic and had an average body mass index of 30.3. Average time to perform the procedure was 12.4 minutes, with the steepest improvement in the first 13 cases. Bilateral placement of the device was successful in 98 (96%) of 102 patients. Of these patients 92 have 12-week hysterosalpingography results (6 patients were lost to follow-up), with 90 (98%) showing bilateral tubal occlusion. There were no intraprocedural or postprocedural complications. CONCLUSION: In our institution and in our experience, office-hysteroscopic placement of the Essure device is a feasible and effective approach for permanent sterilization.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 101
页数:4
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Microinsert nonincisional hysteroscopic sterilization
    Cooper, JM
    Carignan, CS
    Cher, D
    Kerin, JF
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [2] Complications of interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization: Findings from the United States collaborative review of sterilization
    Jamieson, DJ
    Hillis, SD
    Duerr, A
    Marchbanks, PA
    Costello, C
    Peterson, HB
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (06) : 997 - 1002
  • [3] Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre phase II study
    Kerin, JF
    Cooper, JM
    Price, T
    Van Herendael, BJ
    Cayuela-Font, E
    Cher, D
    Carignan, CS
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (06) : 1223 - 1230
  • [4] Tubal sterilization in the United States, 1994-1996
    MacKay, AP
    Kieke, BA
    Koonin, LM
    Beattie, K
    [J]. FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 33 (04): : 161 - 165
  • [5] The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: Findings from the US collaborative review of sterilization
    Peterson, HB
    Xia, ZS
    Hughes, JM
    Wilcox, LS
    Tylor, LR
    Trussell, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 174 (04) : 1161 - 1168
  • [6] Essure®:: a new device for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization in an outpatient setting
    Ubeda, A
    Labastida, R
    Dexeus, S
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 (01) : 196 - 199