Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial

被引:21
|
作者
Zaki, Mary N. [1 ]
Wing, Deborah A. [1 ]
McNulty, Jennifer A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Orange, CA 92668 USA
[2] Miller Childrens & Womens Hosp, Long Beach, CA USA
关键词
cesarean delivery; class III obesity; severely obese; skin closure; smoking; staples; surgical site infections; sutures; tobacco; wound infection; wound separation; SKIN CLOSURE; WOUND COMPLICATIONS; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; DELIVERY; RISK; INFECTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index >= 40 kg/m(2). OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare stainless steel staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure for cesarean delivery in class III obese women with body mass index >= 40 kg/m(2). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized controlled trial at 2 teaching hospitals from 2015 through 2016 in which women with body mass index >= 40 kg/m(2) undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to stainless steel staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The primary outcome was composite wound complication defined as superficial or deep separation and infection occurring up to 6 weeks following delivery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, and patient pain and satisfaction scores. RESULTS: A total of 242 women were enrolled. In all, 119 in the staples group and 119 in the subcuticular suture group were analyzed. Maternal demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. The composite wound complication frequency was 19.3% in the staples group and 17.6% in the subcuticular suture group (P = .74) with an overall wound complication incidence of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. There were also no differences in the frequencies of infection, or in superficial or deep wound separation between the 2 study groups. In a univariate analysis of predictors of wound complications, only current tobacco use was a significant predictor of wound complications (relative risk, 4.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-18.03; P = .02). Fewer women with staple closure would choose the same method with a future delivery (P = .01), however, self-reported pain and concern about wound healing were equal between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: In class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was no difference in composite wound outcome up to 6 weeks postpartum between those who had staples and those who had subcuticular suture skin closure.
引用
收藏
页码:451.e1 / 451.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MONOCRYL and DERMABOND vs Staples in Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through a Lateral Skin Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Patient-Centered Assessment Tool
    Glennie, Raymond A.
    Korczak, Abigail
    Naudie, Douglas D.
    Bryant, Dianne M.
    Howard, James L.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (08) : 2431 - 2435
  • [32] Promoting breastfeeding in Chinese women undergoing cesarean section based on the health belief model A randomized controlled trial
    Hu, Lei
    Ding, Tingting
    Hu, Juan
    Luo, Biru
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (28) : E20815
  • [33] Diathermy versus scalpel in transverse abdominal incision in women undergoing repeated cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial
    Elbohoty, Ahmed E. H.
    Gomaa, Mostafa F.
    Abdelaleim, Mohamed
    Abd-El-Gawad, Magdi
    Elmarakby, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (10) : 1541 - 1546
  • [34] Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Wound Complication After Cesarean Delivery in Women With Class II or III Obesity A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wihbey, Kristina A.
    Joyce, Ellen M.
    Spalding, Zachary T.
    Jones, Hayley J.
    MacKenzie, Todd A.
    Evans, Rebecca H.
    Fung, June L.
    Goldman, Marlene B.
    Erekson, Elisabeth
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (02) : 377 - 384
  • [35] Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial
    Sarreau, Melie
    Isly, Helene
    Poulain, Patrice
    Fontaine, Brigitte
    Morel, Olivier
    Villemonteix, Pascal
    Mares, Pierre
    Mousty, Eve
    Godard, Alain
    Ragot, Stephanie
    Pierre, Fabrice
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 99 (02) : 259 - 266
  • [36] Lifestyle Intervention in Obese Arab Women A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kalter-Leibovici, Ofra
    Younis-Zeidan, Nuha
    Atamna, Ahmed
    Lubin, Flora
    Alpert, Gershon
    Chetrit, Angela
    Novikov, Ilia
    Daoud, Nihaya
    Freedman, Laurence S.
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 170 (11) : 970 - 976
  • [37] Randomized controlled trial: comparison of two surgical techniques for closing the wound following ileostomy closure: purse string vs direct suture
    Dusch, N.
    Goranova, D.
    Herrle, F.
    Niedergethmann, M.
    Kienle, P.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (08) : 1033 - 1040
  • [38] High- vs low-dose oxytocin in lean and obese women: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Wei, Ruth M.
    Bounthavong, Mark
    Hill, Meghan G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2022, 4 (04)
  • [39] Prediction of cesarean delivery in class III obese nulliparous women: An externally validated model using machine learning
    Lodi, Massimo
    Poterie, Audrey
    Exarchakis, Georgios
    Brien, Camille
    Micheaux, Pierre Lafaye De
    Deruelle, Philippe
    Gallix, Benoit
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 52 (07)
  • [40] In Search of an Ideal Closure Method: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Octyl-2-Cyanoacrylate and Adhesive Mesh versus Subcuticular Suture in Reduction Mammaplasty
    Lee, James C.
    Ishtihar, Sherene
    Means, Jessica J.
    Wu, June
    Rohde, Christine H.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (04) : 850 - 856