Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

被引:69
作者
Ventham, Nicholas T. [1 ]
Kennedy, Ewan D. [1 ]
Brady, Richard R. [1 ]
Paterson, Hugh M. [1 ]
Speake, Doug [1 ]
Foo, Irwin [2 ]
Fearon, Kenneth C. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Gen Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Western Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
ANESTHETIC WOUND INFILTRATION; PAIN RELIEF; SYSTEMIC LIDOCAINE; DOUBLE-BLIND; COLORECTAL SURGERY; ABDOMINAL-SURGERY; BOWEL FUNCTION; HOSPITAL STAY; RECOVERY; INTRAPERITONEAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-015-3105-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Intravenous (IV) lidocaine has analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of IV lidocaine in controlling postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgery. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IV lidocaine versus placebo/routine treatment for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcome was opiate requirement at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included cumulative opiate requirement, numerical pain scores (2, 12, 24, 48 h at rest and on movement), recovery indices (nausea and vomiting, length of stay, time until diet resumption, first flatus and bowel movement) and side effects (cardiac/neurological toxicity). Subgroup analyses were performed according to operation type and to compare IV lidocaine with intraperitoneal lidocaine. Fourteen RCTs with 742 patients were included. IV lidocaine was associated with a small but significant reduction in opiate requirement at 24 h compared with placebo/routine care. IV lidocaine was associated with reduced cumulative opiate requirement, reduced pain scores at rest at 2, 12 and 24 h, reduced nausea and vomiting and a shorter time until resumption of diet. The length of stay did not differ between groups. There was a low incidence of IV lidocaine-associated toxicity. In subgroup analyses, there was no difference between IV and intraperitoneal lidocaine in the measured outcomes. IV lidocaine has a multidimensional effect on the quality of recovery. IV lidocaine was associated with lower opiate requirements, reduced nausea and vomiting and a shorter time until resumption of diet. Whilst IV lidocaine appears safe, the optimal treatment regimen remains unknown. Statistical heterogeneity was high.
引用
收藏
页码:2220 / 2234
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010 RES GUID
[2]  
[Anonymous], INTRO STAT
[3]  
BARTLETT EE, 1961, ANESTH ANALG, V40, P296
[4]   What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? [J].
Cepeda, MS ;
Africano, JM ;
Polo, R ;
Alcala, R ;
Carr, DB .
PAIN, 2003, 105 (1-2) :151-157
[5]   A METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL [J].
CHALMERS, TC ;
SMITH, H ;
BLACKBURN, B ;
SILVERMAN, B ;
SCHROEDER, B ;
REITMAN, D ;
AMBROZ, A .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1981, 2 (01) :31-49
[6]  
Cox B, 2003, Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, V17, P111, DOI 10.1053/bean.2003.0275
[7]   Systemic Lidocaine to Improve Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Ambulatory Laparoscopic Surgery [J].
De Oliveira, Gildasio S., Jr. ;
Fitzgerald, Paul ;
Streicher, Lauren F. ;
Marcus, R-Jay ;
McCarthy, Robert J. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 115 (02) :262-267
[8]   Amiodarone as compared with lidocaine for shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation [J].
Dorian, P ;
Cass, D ;
Schwartz, B ;
Cooper, R ;
Gelaznikas, R ;
Barr, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (12) :884-890
[9]   Enhanced recovery after surgery: A consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection [J].
Fearon, KCH ;
Ljungqvist, O ;
Von Meyenfeldt, M ;
Revhaug, A ;
Dejong, CHC ;
Lassen, K ;
Nygren, J ;
Hausel, J ;
Soop, M ;
Andersen, J ;
Kehlet, H .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2005, 24 (03) :466-477
[10]   Analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy using intraperitoneal bupivacaine. [J].
Fuhrer, Y ;
Charpentier, C ;
Boulanger, G ;
Menu, N ;
Grosdidier, G ;
Laxenaire, MC .
ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 1996, 15 (02) :128-134