Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume

被引:107
|
作者
Zhao, Yingru [1 ]
de Bock, Geertruida H. [2 ]
Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn [1 ]
van Klaveren, Rob J. [3 ]
Wang, Ying [1 ]
Bogoni, Luca [4 ]
de Jong, Pim A. [5 ]
Mali, Willem P. [5 ]
van Ooijen, Peter M. A. [1 ]
Oudkerk, Matthijs [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Ctr Med Imaging NE Netherlands, Dept Radiol, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Lievensberg Hosp, Dept Pulmonol, NL-4600 AC Bergen Op Zoom, Netherlands
[4] Siemens Med Solut USA Inc, CAD Grp, Malvern, PA 19355 USA
[5] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Computer-aided detection; Multi-detector computed tomography; Pulmonary nodules; Low dose; Volumetry; INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS; EARLY LUNG-CANCER; BASE-LINE; DETECTION CAD; 2ND READER; SPIRAL CT; RADIOLOGIST PERFORMANCE; AUTOMATIC DETECTION; DIAGNOSIS SYSTEM; SCREENING TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-012-2437-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To evaluate performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) beyond double reading for pulmonary nodules on low-dose computed tomography (CT) by nodule volume. A total of 400 low-dose chest CT examinations were randomly selected from the NELSON lung cancer screening trial. CTs were evaluated by two independent readers and processed by CAD. A total of 1,667 findings marked by readers and/or CAD were evaluated by a consensus panel of expert chest radiologists. Performance was evaluated by calculating sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection and number of false positives, by nodule characteristics and volume. According to the screening protocol, 90.9 % of the findings could be excluded from further evaluation, 49.2 % being small nodules (less than 50 mm(3)). Excluding small nodules reduced false-positive detections by CAD from 3.7 to 1.9 per examination. Of 151 findings that needed further evaluation, 33 (21.9 %) were detected by CAD only, one of them being diagnosed as lung cancer the following year. The sensitivity of nodule detection was 78.1 % for double reading and 96.7 % for CAD. A total of 69.7 % of nodules undetected by readers were attached nodules of which 78.3 % were vessel-attached. CAD is valuable in lung cancer screening to improve sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection beyond double reading, at a low false-positive rate when excluding small nodules. aEuro cent Computer-aided detection (CAD) has known advantages for computed tomography (CT). aEuro cent Combined CAD/nodule size cut-off parameters assist CT lung cancer screening. aEuro cent This combination improves the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection by CT. aEuro cent It increases the positive predictive value for cancer detection.
引用
收藏
页码:2076 / 2084
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Performance analysis of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodules in CT at different slice thicknesses
    Narayanan, Barath Narayanan
    Hardie, Russell Craig
    Kebede, Temesguen Messay
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 5 (01)
  • [42] Improved computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules via deep learning in the sinogram domain
    Gao, Yongfeng
    Tan, Jiaxing
    Liang, Zhengrong
    Li, Lihong
    Huo, Yumei
    VISUAL COMPUTING FOR INDUSTRY BIOMEDICINE AND ART, 2019, 2 (01)
  • [43] Automated lung nodule detection at low-dose CT: Preliminary experience
    Goo, JM
    Lee, JW
    Lee, HJ
    Kim, S
    Kim, JH
    Im, JG
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 4 (04) : 211 - 216
  • [44] Comparative performance analysis for computer aided lung nodule detection and segmentation on ultra-low-dose vs. standard-dose CT
    Wiemker, Rafael
    Rogalla, Patrik
    Opfer, Roland
    Ekin, Ahmet
    Romano, Valentina
    Buelow, Thomas
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2006: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2006, 6146
  • [45] Lung nodule detection on chest CT: Evaluation of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system
    Lee, IJ
    Gamsu, G
    Czum, J
    Wu, N
    Johnson, R
    Chakrapani, S
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 6 (02) : 89 - 93
  • [46] Performance and reading time of lung nodule identification on multidetector CT with or without an artificial intelligence-powered computer-aided detection system
    Hsu, H-H
    Ko, K-H
    Chou, Y-C
    Wu, Y-C
    Chiu, S-H
    Chang, C-K
    Chang, W-C
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 76 (08) : 626.e23 - 626.e32
  • [47] Computer-Aided Detection for Computed Tomographic Colonography Screening A Prospective Comparison of a Double-Reading Paradigm With First-Reader Computer-Aided Detection Against Second-Reader Computer-Aided Detection
    Iussich, Gabriella
    Correale, Loredana
    Senore, Carlo
    Hassan, Cesare
    Segnan, Nereo
    Campanella, Delia
    Bert, Alberto
    Galatola, Giovanni
    Laudi, Cristiana
    Regge, Daniele
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (03) : 173 - 182
  • [48] Performance Analysis in Children of Traditional and Deep Learning CT Lung Nodule Computer-Aided Detection Systems Trained on Adults
    Hardie, Russell C.
    Trout, Andrew T.
    Dillman, Jonathan R.
    Narayanan, Barath N.
    Tanimoto, Aki A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2024, 222 (02)
  • [49] Comparison of ultra-low dose chest CT scanning protocols for the detection of pulmonary nodules: a phantom study
    Milanese, Gianluca
    Silva, Mario
    Frauenfelder, Thomas
    Eberhard, Matthias
    Sabia, Federica
    Martini, Chiara
    Marchiano, Alfonso
    Prokop, Mathias
    Sverzellati, Nicola
    Pastorino, Ugo
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2019, 105 (05): : 394 - 403
  • [50] Impact of Image Quality on the Performance of Computer-Aided Detection of Pulmonary Embolism
    Wittenberg, Rianne
    Peters, Joost F.
    Sonnemans, Jeroen J.
    Bipat, Shandra
    Prokop, Mathias
    Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (01) : 95 - 101