Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume

被引:107
|
作者
Zhao, Yingru [1 ]
de Bock, Geertruida H. [2 ]
Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn [1 ]
van Klaveren, Rob J. [3 ]
Wang, Ying [1 ]
Bogoni, Luca [4 ]
de Jong, Pim A. [5 ]
Mali, Willem P. [5 ]
van Ooijen, Peter M. A. [1 ]
Oudkerk, Matthijs [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Ctr Med Imaging NE Netherlands, Dept Radiol, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Lievensberg Hosp, Dept Pulmonol, NL-4600 AC Bergen Op Zoom, Netherlands
[4] Siemens Med Solut USA Inc, CAD Grp, Malvern, PA 19355 USA
[5] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Computer-aided detection; Multi-detector computed tomography; Pulmonary nodules; Low dose; Volumetry; INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS; EARLY LUNG-CANCER; BASE-LINE; DETECTION CAD; 2ND READER; SPIRAL CT; RADIOLOGIST PERFORMANCE; AUTOMATIC DETECTION; DIAGNOSIS SYSTEM; SCREENING TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-012-2437-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To evaluate performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) beyond double reading for pulmonary nodules on low-dose computed tomography (CT) by nodule volume. A total of 400 low-dose chest CT examinations were randomly selected from the NELSON lung cancer screening trial. CTs were evaluated by two independent readers and processed by CAD. A total of 1,667 findings marked by readers and/or CAD were evaluated by a consensus panel of expert chest radiologists. Performance was evaluated by calculating sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection and number of false positives, by nodule characteristics and volume. According to the screening protocol, 90.9 % of the findings could be excluded from further evaluation, 49.2 % being small nodules (less than 50 mm(3)). Excluding small nodules reduced false-positive detections by CAD from 3.7 to 1.9 per examination. Of 151 findings that needed further evaluation, 33 (21.9 %) were detected by CAD only, one of them being diagnosed as lung cancer the following year. The sensitivity of nodule detection was 78.1 % for double reading and 96.7 % for CAD. A total of 69.7 % of nodules undetected by readers were attached nodules of which 78.3 % were vessel-attached. CAD is valuable in lung cancer screening to improve sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection beyond double reading, at a low false-positive rate when excluding small nodules. aEuro cent Computer-aided detection (CAD) has known advantages for computed tomography (CT). aEuro cent Combined CAD/nodule size cut-off parameters assist CT lung cancer screening. aEuro cent This combination improves the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection by CT. aEuro cent It increases the positive predictive value for cancer detection.
引用
收藏
页码:2076 / 2084
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Computer-aided detection and automated CT volumetry of pulmonary nodules
    Katharina Marten
    Christoph Engelke
    European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 888 - 901
  • [12] Comparison of two reader modes of computer-aided diagnosis in lung nodules on low-dose chest CT scan
    Hu, Qiongjie
    Wang, Shaofang
    Chen, Chong
    Kang, Shichao
    Sun, Ziyan
    Wang, Yujin
    Xiang, Min
    Guan, Hanxiong
    Liu, Yiwen
    Xia, Liming
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE OPTICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 15 (02)
  • [13] Small pulmonary nodules:: Effect of two computer-aided detection systems on radiologist performance
    Das, Marco
    Muehlenbruch, Georg
    Mahnken, Andreas H.
    Flohr, Thomas G.
    Guendel, Lutz
    Stanzel, Sven
    Kraus, Thomas
    Guenther, Rolf W.
    Wildberger, Joachim E.
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) : 564 - 571
  • [14] Computer-Aided Nodule Detection and Volumetry to Reduce Variability Between Radiologists in the Interpretation of Lung Nodules at Low-Dose Screening Computed Tomography
    Jeon, Kyung Nyeo
    Goo, Jin Mo
    Lee, Chang Hyun
    Lee, Youkyung
    Choo, Ji Yung
    Lee, Nyoung Keun
    Shim, Mi-Suk
    Lee, In Sun
    Kim, Kwang Gi
    Gierada, David S.
    Bae, Kyongtae T.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2012, 47 (08) : 457 - 461
  • [15] Aspects of computer-aided detection (CAD) and volumetry of pulmonary nodules using multislice CT
    Wiemker, R
    Rogalla, P
    Blaffert, T
    Sifri, D
    Hay, O
    Shah, E
    Truyen, R
    Fleiter, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 : S46 - S56
  • [16] Computer-Aided Detection of Lung Nodules on CT With a Computerized Pulmonary Vessel Suppressed Function
    Lo, ShihChung B.
    Freedman, Matthew T.
    Gillis, Laura B.
    White, Charles S.
    Mun, Seong K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (03) : 480 - 488
  • [17] Computer-aided detection and analysis of pulmonary nodule from CT images: A survey
    Dhara, Ashis Kumar
    Mukhopadhyay, Sudipta
    Khandelwal, Niranjan
    IETE TECHNICAL REVIEW, 2012, 29 (04) : 265 - 275
  • [18] Prospective Pilot Evaluation of Radiologists and Computer-aided Pulmonary Nodule Detection on Ultra-low-Dose CT With Tin Filtration
    Takahashi, Edwin A.
    Koo, Chi Wan
    White, Darin B.
    Lindell, Rebecca M.
    Sykes, Anne-Marie G.
    Levin, David L.
    Kuzo, Ronald S.
    Wolf, Matthias
    Bogoni, Luca
    Carter, Rickey E.
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    Fletcher, Joel G.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2018, 33 (06) : 396 - 401
  • [19] Computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules in CT scans: radiologist performance and reading time with incremental CAD assistance
    Roos, Justus E.
    Paik, David
    Olsen, David
    Liu, Emily G.
    Chow, Lawrence C.
    Leung, Ann N.
    Mindelzun, Robert
    Choudhury, Kingshuk R.
    Naidich, David P.
    Napel, Sandy
    Rubin, Geoffrey D.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (03) : 549 - 557
  • [20] Computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules in CT scans: radiologist performance and reading time with incremental CAD assistance
    Justus E. Roos
    David Paik
    David Olsen
    Emily G. Liu
    Lawrence C. Chow
    Ann N. Leung
    Robert Mindelzun
    Kingshuk R. Choudhury
    David P. Naidich
    Sandy Napel
    Geoffrey D. Rubin
    European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 549 - 557