共 15 条
Standardizing Laryngeal Cleft Evaluations: Reliability of the Interarytenoid Assessment Protocol
被引:16
作者:
Coppess, Steven
[1
]
Padia, Reema
[2
]
Horn, David
[2
]
Parikh, Sanjay R.
[2
]
Inglis, Andrew
[2
]
Bly, Randall
[2
]
Dahl, John
[2
]
Dudley, Daniel
[1
]
Johnson, Kaalan
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, MS OA-9-321,POB 5371, Seattle, WA 98145 USA
关键词:
laryngeal cleft;
type 1 laryngeal cleft;
interarytenoid;
dysphagia;
interarytenoid assessment protocol;
NASAL ENDOSCOPY;
MANAGEMENT;
DIAGNOSIS;
AGREEMENT;
TOOL;
D O I:
10.1177/0194599818806283
中图分类号:
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号:
100213 ;
摘要:
Objective While the Benjamin-Inglis classification system is widely used to categorize laryngeal clefts, it does not clearly differentiate a type 1 cleft from normal anatomy, and there is no widely accepted or validated protocol for systematically evaluating interarytenoid mucosal height. We sought to propose the interarytenoid assessment protocol as a method to standardize the description of the interarytenoid anatomy and to test its reliability. Study Design Retrospective review of endoscopic videos. Setting Pediatric academic center. Subjects and Methods The interarytenoid assessment protocol comprises 4 steps for evaluation of the interarytenoid region relative to known anatomic landmarks in the supraglottis, glottis, and subglottis. Thirty consecutively selected videos of the protocol were reviewed by 4 otolaryngologists. The raters were blinded to identifying information, and the video order was randomized for each review. We assessed protocol completion times and calculated Cohen's linear-weighted kappa coefficient between blinded expert raters and with the operating surgeon to evaluate interrater/intrarater reliability. Results Median age was 4.9 years (59 months; range, 1 month to 20 years). Median completion time was 144 seconds. Interrater and intrarater reliability showed substantial agreement (interrater kappa = 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55-0.87]; intrarater mean kappa = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.59-0.92/rater 1, 0.47-0.85/rater 2]; P < .001). Comparing raters to the operating surgeon demonstrated substantial agreement (mean kappa = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.31-0.79/rater 1, 0.48-0.89/rater 2; P < .001). Conclusion The interarytenoid assessment protocol appears reliable in describing interarytenoid anatomy. Rapid completion times and substantial interrater/intrarater reliability were demonstrated. Incorporation of this protocol may provide important steps toward improved standardization in the anatomic description of the interarytenoid region in pediatric dysphagia.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 539
页数:7
相关论文