Exploration of Predictors of Teaching Effectiveness: The Professor's Perspective

被引:6
作者
Monteiro, Heather [1 ]
Wilson, Janie [2 ]
Beyer, Denise [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia So Univ, Dept Mkt & Logist, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
[2] Georgia So Univ, Dept Psychol, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
关键词
Attribution Theory; College teaching; Structural Equation Modeling; Partial least squares; Survey; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; STUDENT-RATINGS; QUALITY; BIAS; PERCEPTIONS; INSTRUCTORS; COLLEGE; LIKING; SEX;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-013-9186-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research is an exploratory investigation of what attributions college professors place upon the cause of teaching effectiveness and success. Student evaluations of teaching are used as a proxy for teaching effectiveness. The study is supported by Attribution Theory in that perceptions and attributions of causality affect motivation and success. The research evaluates data that supported Attribution Theory. The data was collected using Qualtrics through a web-based survey. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the survey data, with interesting conclusions. The most interesting difference was that between the perceptions of causal attribution of tenured and non-tenured professors. The data show that tenured professors attribute teaching effectiveness to factors outside their control such as characteristics of the students and the institution, while non-tenured professors do not attribute teaching effectiveness to external factors. The implications of this study are support for Attribution Theory in the college teaching context, and may be useful for university administration in motivating professors for effective teaching. Future research includes deductive study to further explore the scope and boundary conditions of Attribution Theory in college teaching.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 337
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[2]   Instructors' perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction [J].
Beran, Tanya N. ;
Rokosh, Jennifer L. .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (02) :171-184
[3]   Different academics' characteristics, different perceptions on quality assessment? [J].
Cardoso, Sonia ;
Joao Rosa, Maria ;
Santos, Cristina S. .
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2013, 21 (01) :96-+
[4]   Audit cultures and quality assurance mechanisms in England: a study of their perceived impact on the work of academics [J].
Cheng, Ming .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 15 (03) :259-271
[5]  
Chin WW, 1998, QUANT METH SER, P295
[6]  
Elam S., 2007, J COLL ADMISSION, V2, P20
[7]  
Felton J., 2004, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, V29, P91, DOI 10.1080/0260293032000158180
[8]   EVALUATING STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS WITH UNOBSERVABLE VARIABLES AND MEASUREMENT ERROR [J].
FORNELL, C ;
LARCKER, DF .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1981, 18 (01) :39-50
[9]   PREDICTIVE SAMPLE REUSE METHOD WITH APPLICATIONS [J].
GEISSER, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1975, 70 (350) :320-328
[10]   AGE, SEX, AND ATTRACTIVENESS AS FACTORS IN STUDENT-RATINGS OF TEACHERS - DEVELOPMENTAL-STUDY [J].
GOEBEL, BL ;
CASHEN, VM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 71 (05) :646-653