Bibliometric Analysis of Publishing Trends in Fiber Crops in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science

被引:28
作者
Bartol, Tomaz [1 ]
Mackiewicz-Talarczyk, Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Dept Agron, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Sci Informat & Int Cooperat INF&MP, Poznan, Poland
关键词
fiber crops; bibliometrics; scientometrics; informetrics; mapping of science; publications; INDEX; TERMS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1080/15440478.2014.972000
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS1 [纺织工业、染整工业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0821 ;
摘要
The aim was to evaluate natural fibers (fiber crops or fiber plants) in Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), and Google Scholar with regard to growth trends and leading countries by authors/coauthors of documents. Basic functionalities of information systems were assessed. Search syntax was based on article titles, abstracts, and keywords (topics). The three information systems can only be consistently compared on the basis of article titles. Different ranks of individual fiber crops can be observed among the systems. The cumulative data for the entire period show different characteristics than the more recent trends. Specific crops show more intensive growth in the recent period. Retrieval with topics in Scopus and WOS also shows differences, probably on account of indexing method (KeyWords Plus in WOS and thesauri descriptors in Scopus). Several countries are ranked much higher in WOS than Scopus, and vice versa, indicating differences in coverage of journals. The principal contributing countries are China, India, and USA. China returns similar total counts as USA in 1994-2013 but is producing twice as many records in the most recent period. Interpretation of results depends on the query (selection of search terms, fields, and search syntax) and database or information system under analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 541
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar A content comprehensiveness comparison [J].
Adriaanse, Leslie S. ;
Rensleigh, Chris .
ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2013, 31 (06) :727-744
[2]  
Adriaanse LS, 2011, S AFR J LIBR INF, V77, P169
[3]   The current status of ethnobiological research in Latin America: gaps and perspectives [J].
Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino ;
Silva, Josivan Soares ;
Almeida Campos, Juliana Loureiro ;
Sousa, Rosemary Silva ;
Silva, Taline Cristina ;
Nobrega Alves, Romulo Romeu .
JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE, 2013, 9
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ANN LIBR INF STUD
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WEB SCI CORE COLLECT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, J NAT FIBERS, DOI [DOI 10.1300/J395V01N0204, 10.1300/J395v01n02_04, DOI 10.1300/J395V01N02_04]
[7]  
[Anonymous], SCOPUS
[8]   Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology research in Pakistan [J].
Bajwa, R. S. ;
Yaldram, K. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 95 (02) :529-540
[9]  
Bakkalbasi Nisa, 2006, Biomed Digit Libr, V3, P7, DOI 10.1186/1742-5581-3-7
[10]  
Balasubramani R., 2011, LIB PHILOS PRAC 1001