Internal emergency department validation of the simplified MISSED score

被引:8
|
作者
Sivayoham, Narani [1 ]
Holmes, Paul [1 ]
Cecconi, Maurizio [2 ]
Rhodes, Andrew [2 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust, Dept Emergency Med, London SW17 0QT, England
[2] St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust, Dept Intens Care Med, London SW17 0QT, England
关键词
age factors; clinical prediction rule; emergency department; emergency medicine; international normalized ratio; mortality; sepsis; septic shock; serum albumin; severe sepsis; GOAL-DIRECTED THERAPY; SEPSIS MEDS SCORE; SEPTIC SHOCK; MORTALITY; ALBUMIN; INFLAMMATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000176
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe MISSED score was derived and validated in emergency department (ED) patients with sepsis who were admitted to the ICU. This score has now been refined and simplified. The independent variables associated with mortality are age at least 65 years, serum albumin 27g/l or less, and an international normalized ratio at least 1.3. The simplified MISSED score ranges from 0 to 3 depending on the number of variables present.ObjectiveThe primary objective is to validate the simplified MISSED score for predicting all-cause mortality in the ED population admitted with sepsis. The secondary end-point is to validate the risk stratification for ICU admission.MethodsThis is a pragmatic retrospective study of prospectively collected data. ED patients admitted with a diagnosis of sepsis in the year 2012 were studied. Those on warfarin were excluded. The simplified MISSED score was calculated for each patient. The test characteristics for mortality of the simplified MISSED score and the odds ratios of the high-risk groups for the secondary end-point were calculated.ResultsIn total, 674 patients, including 65 deaths, were studied. The area under the curve for the simplified MISSED score was 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.77; P<0.0001]. The test characteristics for mortality were as follows: sensitivity 93.9% (95% CI 85-98.3), specificity 37.9% (95% CI 34.1-41.9), positive predictive value 13.9% (95% CI 10.8-17.5), and negative predictive value 98.3% (95% CI 95.7-99.5). The odds ratio for mortality for a score 2 or more was 5.01 (95% CI 2.93-8.57; P<0.0001), and that for ICU admission was 3.00 (95% CI 1.70-5.28; P=0.0001).ConclusionThe simplified MISSED score could be used to risk stratify septic patients in the ED.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 326
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] External validation of the MISSED score to predict mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department
    Ryoo, Seung Mok
    Ahn, Shin
    Kim, Won Young
    Lim, Kyoung Soo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (05) : 327 - 330
  • [2] The MISSED score, a new scoring system to predict Mortality In Severe Sepsis in the Emergency Department: a derivation and validation study
    Sivayoham, Narani
    Rhodes, Andrew
    Cecconi, Maurizio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 21 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [3] Development and internal validation of a simple prognostic score for early sepsis risk stratification in the emergency department
    Liu, Bofu
    Li, Dongze
    Cheng, Yisong
    Yu, Jing
    Jia, Yu
    Zhang, Qin
    Liu, Yanmei
    Cao, Yu
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [4] Validation of the "Four Score" coma scale in the emergency department
    Kashyap, Rahul
    Nash, David L.
    Bhagra, Anjali
    Bellolio, M. Fernanda
    Stead, Latha G.
    Wijdicks, Eelco F. M.
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 62 : S48 - S48
  • [5] Validation trials of the pulmonary score: An asthma severity score for children in the Emergency Department
    Smith, SR
    Rosenstein, A
    Cox, K
    Hodge, D
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2000, 47 (04) : 119A - 119A
  • [6] Validation of the aortic dissection detection risk score in the emergency department
    Morello, F.
    Castelli, M.
    Vanni, S.
    Giachino, F.
    Bono, A.
    Forno, D.
    Soardo, F.
    Nazerian, P.
    Betti, L.
    Grifoni, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 31 - 31
  • [7] The development and validation of a resource consumption score of an emergency department consultation
    Mueller, Martin
    Schechter, Clyde B.
    Hautz, Wolf E.
    Sauter, Thomas C.
    Exadaktylos, Aristomenis K.
    Stock, Stephanie
    Birrenbach, Tanja
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [8] Multicenter Emergency Department Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score
    Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh
    Sivilotti, Marco L. A.
    Le Sage, Natalie
    Yan, Justin W.
    Huang, Paul
    Hegdekar, Mona
    Mercier, Eric
    Mukarram, Muhammad
    Nemnom, Marie-Joe
    McRae, Andrew D.
    Rowe, Brian H.
    Stiell, Ian G.
    Wells, George A.
    Krahn, Andrew D.
    Taljaard, Monica
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 180 (05) : 737 - 744
  • [9] Validation of a New Coma Scale, the FOUR Score, in the Emergency Department
    Latha G. Stead
    Eelco F. M. Wijdicks
    Anjali Bhagra
    Rahul Kashyap
    M. Fernanda Bellolio
    David L. Nash
    Sailaja Enduri
    Raquel Schears
    Bamlet William
    Neurocritical Care, 2009, 10
  • [10] EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF THE QSOFA SCORE IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS WITH PNEUMONIA
    George, Naomi
    Elie-Turenne, Marie-Carmelle
    Seethala, Raghu R.
    Baslanti, Tezcan Ozrazgat
    Bozorgmehri, Shahab
    Mark, Kemba
    Meurer, David
    Bihorac, Azra
    Aisiku, Imoigele P.
    Hou, Peter C.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 57 (06): : 755 - 764