The Probability of Mantle Plumes in Global Tomographic Models

被引:9
|
作者
Marignier, Augustin [1 ,2 ]
Ferreira, Ana M. G. [2 ,3 ]
Kitching, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Mullard Space Sci Lab, London, England
[2] UCL, Dept Earth Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, CERIS, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
global tomography; mantle plumes; wavelets; SHEAR-VELOCITY MODEL; TELESEISMIC TRAVEL-TIME; WAVE DISPERSION; NON-GAUSSIANITY; RESOLUTION; HOTSPOTS; ANISOTROPY; PROVINCES; DYNAMICS; S40RTS;
D O I
10.1029/2020GC009276
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
While the downward mass flux in the Earth's deep interior is well constrained by seismic tomography, the upward flux is still poorly understood and debated. Recent tomography studies suggest that we are now starting to resolve deep mantle plume structures. However, a lack of uncertainty quantification impedes a full assessment of their significance and whether they are statistically distinct from noise. This work uses a spherical wavelet transform and random noise realizations to quantify the probability of deep plume-like features in six recent global tomographic models. We find that out of 50 possible mantle deep plumes, 12 are highly likely, with probabilities larger than 80%, and 12 are likely, with probability between 70% and 80%. Objective, quantitative approaches as proposed in this study should be used for model interpretation. The five most likely deep mantle plumes are Tahiti, Macdonald, East Africa, Pitcairn, and Marquesas, which have some of the largest buoyancy fluxes estimated in a previous study that used hotspot swell volumes. This could resolve past discrepancies between deep mantle plumes inferred by visual analysis of tomography models and flux estimations from hotspot swell data. In addition, a notable unlikely deep mantle plume is Yellowstone, with probability lower than 50%. We also identify a likely deep mantle plume associated with the Amsterdam-St Paul hotspot, a region scarcely discussed in previous studies and that deserves future investigation. Hence, our automated, objective approach is a valuable alternative approach for the quantitative interpretation of tomographic models.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A case for mantle plumes
    Geoffrey F. Davies
    ChineseScienceBulletin, 2005, (15) : 7 - 20
  • [22] A case for mantle plumes
    Davies, GF
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2005, 50 (15): : 1541 - 1554
  • [23] The source location of mantle plumes from 3D spherical models of mantle convection
    Li, Mingming
    Zhong, Shijie
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2017, 478 : 47 - 57
  • [24] The influence of uncertain mantle density and viscosity structures on the calculations of deep mantle flow and lateral motion of plumes
    Li, Mingming
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 233 (03) : 1916 - 1937
  • [25] Mantle plumes are oxidised
    Moussallam, Yves
    Longpre, Marc-Antoine
    McCammon, Catherine
    Gomez-Ulla, Alejandra
    Rose-Koga, Estelle F.
    Scaillet, Bruno
    Peters, Nial
    Gennaro, Emanuela
    Paris, Raphael
    Oppenheimer, Clive
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 527
  • [26] The structure and the surface manifestation of mantle plumes in depth-dependent three-dimensional models
    Süle B.
    Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica, 2005, 40 (1): : 89 - 104
  • [28] Data-space cross-validation of mantle structure in global tomographic models underneath the Pacific Ocean
    Wamba, Mathurin D.
    Simons, Frederik J.
    Irving, Jessica C. E.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 241 (01) : 241 - 259
  • [29] Seismic structure and origin of hotspots and mantle plumes
    Zhao, D
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2001, 192 (03) : 251 - 265
  • [30] Narrow, Fast, and "Cool" Mantle Plumes Caused by Strain-Weakening Rheology in Earth's Lower Mantle
    Guelcher, A. J. P.
    Golabek, G. J.
    Thielmann, M.
    Ballmer, M. D.
    Tackley, P. J.
    GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2022, 23 (10)