Causal Powers, Hume's Early German Critics, and Kant's Response to Hume

被引:5
作者
Chance, Brian A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Oklahoma, Dept Humanities & Philosophy, Edmond, OK 73034 USA
关键词
Causation; David Hume; Moses Mendelssohn; J.G; Sulzer; J.N; Tetens; Eric Watkins;
D O I
10.1515/kant-2013-0014
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Eric Watkins has argued on philosophical, textual, and historical grounds that Kant's account of causation in the first Critique should not be read as an attempt to refute Hume's account of causation. In this paper, I challenge the arguments for Watkins' claim. Specifically, I argue (1) that Kant's philosophical commitments, even on Watkins' reading, are not obvious obstacles to refuting Hume, (2) that textual evidence from the Disciple of Pure Reason suggests Kant conceived of his account of causation as such a refutation, and (3) that none of Hume's early German critics provided responses to this account that would have satisfied Kant. Watkins' reading of Kant's account of causation is thus more compatible with traditional views about Kant's relationship to Hume than Watkins believes.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 236
页数:24
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Allias Lucy, 2007, BRITISH JOURNAL FOR, V15, P213
  • [2] Allison Henry, 2008, CUSTOM AND REASON IN, P354
  • [3] Altmann Alexander, 1973, MOSES MENDELSSOHN A, P74
  • [4] [Anonymous], ARCH GESCH PHILOS
  • [5] Beck Lewis, 1969, EARLY GERMAN PHILOSO, P421
  • [6] Buckle Stephen, 2001, HUMES ENLIGHTENMENT, P149
  • [7] Sensibilism, Psychologism, and Kant's Debt to Hume
    Chance, Brian A.
    [J]. KANTIAN REVIEW, 2011, 16 (03) : 325 - 349
  • [8] Erdmann Benno, 1888, Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie, V1, P62
  • [9] Fischer Kuno, 1860, IMMANUEL KANT ENTWIC, P30
  • [10] Flew Anthony., 1976, HUME, P257