Evaluation of diffusion and dilution methods to determine the antimicrobial activity of water-soluble chitosan derivatives

被引:62
作者
Jiang, L. [1 ]
Wang, F. [1 ]
Han, F. [1 ]
Prinyawiwatkul, W. [1 ]
No, H. K. [2 ]
Ge, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Ctr Agr, Dept Food Sci, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Catholic Univ Daegu, Dept Food Sci & Technol, Hayang, South Korea
关键词
agar dilution; antimicrobial activity; broth microdilution; chitosan; disc diffusion; ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; AGAR DILUTION; CAMPYLOBACTER-JEJUNI; VIBRIO-VULNIFICUS; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT; PLANT-EXTRACTS; SUSCEPTIBILITY; CHITIN; ETEST; FOODS;
D O I
10.1111/jam.12111
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims Chitosan has gained wide applications in the food industry and biomedical field owing to its biodegradability, biocompatibility, nontoxicity and its antimicrobial activity against a wide spectrum of micro-organisms. However, the methods used to investigate antimicrobial effects of chitosan vary considerably among studies, making comparisons difficult. Methods and Results One diffusion (disc diffusion) and two dilution (agar dilution and broth microdilution) methods commonly used in clinical laboratories to assess microbial susceptibility/resistance to antimicrobial agents were comparatively used to determine the antimicrobial activity of two water-soluble chitosan derivatives (molecular weights of 43 and 67kDa) against 31 representative foodborne pathogens. When tested at 1 center dot 6% for the 43-kDa chitosan and 3 center dot 2% for the 67-kDa chitosan, by disc diffusion, approximately 10- to 11-mm-diameter inhibition zones were observed for all of the bacterial groups, except for Salmonella tested for the 67-kDa chitosan where no inhibition zone was observed. By agar dilution and broth microdilution, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values varied largely dependent upon the molecular weight of chitosan, bacterial genus/species and the testing method. The agreement between MIC values obtained by the two methods was poor, with broth microdilution generally having lower MIC values than agar dilution. Regardless of the testing method, Salmonella strains were the least susceptible among Gram-negative strains for both chitosans, followed by Escherichia coli and Vibrio. Conclusions Besides chitosan's molecular weight and bacterial genus/species, the antimicrobial activity of chitosan was also influenced largely by the susceptibility testing method used. Significance and Impact of the Study This is the first study that comparatively evaluated these diffusion and dilution methods, particularly two quantitative methods (agar dilution and broth microdilution), to assess the antimicrobial activity of two water-soluble chitosans against a large number of foodborne pathogens. The study highlights the need for standardized methods to be used in evaluating chitosan's antimicrobial properties in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 963
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, METH DIL ANT SUSC TE, Vseventh
[2]  
Aranaz I., 2009, CURRENT CHEM BIOL, V3, P203, DOI [10.2174/2212796810903020203, 10.2174/187231309788166415]
[3]   Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods - a review [J].
Burt, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 94 (03) :223-253
[4]   Antibacterial effects of N-sulfonated and N-sulfobenzoyl chitosan and application to oyster preservation [J].
Chen, CS ;
Liau, WY ;
Tsai, GJ .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1998, 61 (09) :1124-1128
[5]   Fate of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimunum, and Vibrio vulnificus in raw oysters treated with chitosan [J].
Chhabra, Pallavi ;
Huang, Yao-Wen ;
Frank, Joseph F. ;
Chmielewski, Revis ;
Gates, Keith .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2006, 69 (07) :1600-1604
[6]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2008, M100S18 CLIN LAB STA
[7]  
CLSI, 2008, M31A3 CLSI
[8]   EFFECT OF CHITOSAN IN MEAT PRESERVATION [J].
DARMADJI, P ;
IZUMIMOTO, M .
MEAT SCIENCE, 1994, 38 (02) :243-254
[9]   Chitosan: antimicrobial activity, interactions with food components and applicability as a coating on fruit and vegetables [J].
Devlieghere, F ;
Vermeulen, A ;
Debevere, J .
FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 21 (06) :703-714
[10]   Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan against Campylobacter spp. and Other Microorganisms and Its Mechanism of Action [J].
Ganan, M. ;
Carrascosa, A. V. ;
Martinez-Rodriguez, A. J. .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2009, 72 (08) :1735-1738