共 30 条
Agreement of cardiac output measurement between pulse contour analysis and thermodilution in various body positions: a porcine study
被引:4
作者:
Shih, Ping-Cheng
[1
]
Hung, Yu-Chun
[2
]
Chen, Ying-Lun
[2
]
Tsai, Hsin-Jung
[2
]
Chen, Chia-Ying
[2
]
Huang, Chun-Jen
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Buddhist Tzu Chi Gen Hosp, Taipei Branch, Dept Anesthesiol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Mackay Mem Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Tzu Chi Univ, Sch Med, Hualien, Taiwan
关键词:
Pulse contour analysis;
Thermodilution;
Supine;
Reverse Trendelenburg;
Trendelenburg;
Lateral decubitus;
Bland-Altman;
PULMONARY-ARTERY CATHETER;
RIGHT HEART CATHETERIZATION;
SEPTIC SHOCK;
COMPLICATIONS;
SURGERY;
TRENDELENBURG;
HEMODYNAMICS;
RELIABILITY;
HUMANS;
MODEL;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jss.2012.07.012
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: We elucidated the effects of various body positions on the agreement of cardiac output (CO) measurement between pulse contour analysis with the PiCCO monitor and thermodilution with pulmonary artery catheterization. Methods: Fifteen anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs (40 +/- 2 kg) were sequentially placed in various positions to facilitate simultaneous CO measurement. Between-methods agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. Trending ability was assessed using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient analysis. Results: In supine, reverse Trendelenburg, Trendelenburg, and left lateral decubitus (lateral) positions, CO measured by these two methodswas comparable (4.9 +/- 1.5 versus 4.6 +/- 1.6 L/min, 4.6 +/- 2.2 versus 4.8 +/- 1.8 L/min, 5.1 +/- 2.1 versus 4.9 +/- 2.1 L/min, and 5.4 +/- 1.8 versus 5.0 +/- 1.6 L/min; all P > 0.05). Mean bias betweenmethods and limits of agreement (percentage error) were 0.3 +/- 2.9 L/min (61%), -0.3 +/- 3.3 L/min (71%), 0.1 +/- 4.1 L/min (77%), and 0.5 +/- 3.7 L/min (71%). Directional changes of paired CO revealed 66% (reverse Trendelenburg), 57% (Trendelenburg), and 66% (lateral) concordance. The correlation coefficient (r(2)) was 0.199, 0.127, and 0.108. For paired CO <= 6 L/min, meanbias betweenmethods andlimits of agreement (percentage error) were 0.2 +/- 1.0 L/min (25%), -0.1 +/- 1.0 L/min (28%), 0.2 +/- 1.1 L/min (29%), and 0.5 +/- 0.9 L/min (23%). Directional changes of paired CO revealed 84% (reverse Trendelenburg), 76% (Trendelenburg), and 65% (lateral) concordance. The correlation coefficient (r(2)) was 0.583, 0.626, and 0.213. Conclusions: The mean CO measured by pulse contour analysis and thermodilution did not agree well in various body positions. Moreover, the measurements tended to trend differently in response to positional changes. For paired CO <= 6 L/min, however, the betweenmethods agreement and the trending ability improved significantly. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 322
页数:8
相关论文