Randomised controlled trial protocol (GRIP study): examining the effect of involvement of a general practitioner and home care oncology nurse after a cancer diagnosis on patient reported outcomes and healthcare utilization

被引:17
作者
Perfors, I. A. A. [1 ]
Helsper, C. W. [1 ]
Noteboom, E. A. [1 ]
van der Wall, E. [2 ]
de Wit, N. J. [1 ]
May, A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, POB 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Internal Med & Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
BMC CANCER | 2018年 / 18卷
关键词
Primary care; Cancer; General practitioner; Homecare oncology nurse; Decision making; Follow-up; Patient satisfaction; Healthcare utilization; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; INFORMATION; QUALITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; INSTRUMENT; PHYSICIANS; STANDARD; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-018-4005-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Due to the ageing population and improving diagnostics and treatments, the number of cancer patients and cancer survivors is increasing. Policymakers, patients and professionals advocate a transfer of (part of) cancer care from the hospital environment to the primary care setting, as this could stimulate personalized and integrated care, increase cost-effectiveness and would better meet the patients' needs and expectations. The effects of structured active follow-up from primary care after cancer diagnosis have not been studied yet. Therefore the GRIP study aims to assess the effects of structured follow-up after a cancer diagnosis, by a primary care team including a general practitioner (GP) and a home care oncology nurse (HON), on satisfaction and healthcare utilization of patients treated with curative intent. Methods: We will conduct a multicentre, two-arm randomised controlled trial in The Netherlands. We plan to include 150 patients who will be treated with curative intent for either breast, lung, colorectal, gynaecologic cancer, or melanoma. Further inclusion criteria are: age 18 years and older, able to answer questionnaires in Dutch, GP agrees to participate and the possibility to include the patient before the start of treatment. All patients receive care as usual. The intervention arm will receive additional structured follow-up consisting of a GP consultation before onset of treatment to empower the patient for shared decision making with the specialist and a minimum of three contacts with the HON during and after treatment. Primary outcomes are: patient satisfaction with care at the level of specialist, GP and nurse and healthcare utilization. Secondary outcomes include: quality of life, employment status, patient empowerment, shared decision making, mental health and satisfaction with given information. Repeated questionnaires, filled in by the participants, will be assessed within the 1-year study period. Discussion: This randomised controlled trial will evaluate the effects of structured follow-up after a cancer diagnosis by a primary care team including a GP and HON, for patients undergoing treatment with curative intent. Results from the present study may provide the evidence needed to optimally rearrange responsibilities in cancer care delivery and consequently improve cancer care and patient related outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY
    AARONSON, NK
    AHMEDZAI, S
    BERGMAN, B
    BULLINGER, M
    CULL, A
    DUEZ, NJ
    FILIBERTI, A
    FLECHTNER, H
    FLEISHMAN, SB
    DEHAES, JCJM
    KAASA, S
    KLEE, M
    OSOBA, D
    RAZAVI, D
    ROFE, PB
    SCHRAUB, S
    SNEEUW, K
    SULLIVAN, M
    TAKEDA, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) : 365 - 376
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, NAZ BIJ KANK ROL 1 L
  • [3] EORTC QLQ-INFO26: A questionnaire to assess information given to cancer patients a preliminary analysis in eight countries
    Arraras, Juan Ignacio
    Kuljanic-Vlasic, Karin
    Bjordal, Kristin
    Yun, Young Ho
    Efficace, Fabio
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Mills, Judith
    Greimel, Elfriede
    Krauss, Oliver
    Velikova, Galina
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2007, 16 (03) : 249 - 254
  • [4] Bouwmans C., 2013, Handleiding iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire
  • [5] Bouwmans C., 2013, Handleiding iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)
  • [6] An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32)
    Brédart, A
    Bottomley, A
    Blazeby, JM
    Conroy, T
    Coens, C
    D'Haese, S
    Chie, WC
    Hammerlid, E
    Arraras, JI
    Efficace, F
    Rodary, C
    Schraub, S
    Costantini, M
    Costantini, A
    Joly, F
    Sezer, O
    Razavi, D
    Mehlitz, M
    Bielska-Lasota, M
    Aaronson, NK
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 41 (14) : 2120 - 2131
  • [7] Why do some patients prefer to leave decisions up to the doctor: lack of self-efficacy or a matter of trust?
    Chawla, Neetu
    Arora, Neeraj K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2013, 7 (04) : 592 - 601
  • [8] DS14: Standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and Type D personality
    Denollet, J
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2005, 67 (01): : 89 - 97
  • [9] Drury M, 2000, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V50, P105
  • [10] Health Council of the Netherlands, 2007, PUBL HLTH COUNC NETH