Validation of Renal Artery Dimensions Measured by Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients Referred for Renal Sympathetic Denervation

被引:3
作者
van Kranenburg, Matthijs [1 ,2 ]
Karanasos, Antonis [1 ]
Chelu, Raluca Gabriela [1 ,2 ]
van der Heide, Elco [1 ]
Ouhlous, Mohamed [2 ]
Nieman, Koen [1 ,2 ]
van Mieghem, Nicolas [1 ]
Krestin, Gabriel [2 ]
Niessen, Wiro [2 ,3 ]
Zijlstra, Felix [1 ]
van Geuns, Robert-Jan [1 ,2 ]
Daemen, Joost [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Cardiol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Med Informat, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Renal artery; percutaneous renal sympathetic denervation; magnetic resonance angiography; intravascular ultrasound; RESISTANT HYPERTENSION; SEMIAUTOMATED MEASUREMENT; MR-ANGIOGRAPHY; STENOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; DIAGNOSIS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2015.03.014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a well-established modality for the assessment of renal artery stenosis. Using dedicated quantitative analyses, MRA can become a useful tool for assessing renal artery dimensions in patients referred for renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) and for providing accurate measurements of vascular response after RDN. The purpose of this study was to test the reproducibility of a novel MRA quantitative imaging tool and to validate these measurements against intravascular ultrasound (NUS). Materials and Methods: In nine patients referred for renal denervation, renal artery dimensions were measured. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility. Results: Mean lumen diameter was 5.8 +/- 0.7 mm, with a very good intraobserver and interobserver variability of 0.7% (reproducibility: bias, 0 mm; standard deviation [SD], 0.1 mm) and 1.2% (bias, 0 mm; SD, 0.1 mm), respectively. Mean total lumen volume was 1035.3 +/- 403.6 mm(3) with good intraobserver and interobserver variability of 2.9% (bias, -9.7 mm(3); SD, 34.0 mm(3)) and 2.8% (bias, -11.4 mm(3); SD, 42.4 mm(3)). The correlation (Pearson R) between mean lumen diameter measured with MRA and IVUS was 0.750 (P = .002). Conclusions: Using a novel MRA quantitative imaging tool, renal artery dimensions can be measured with good reproducibility and accuracy. MRA-derived diameters and volumes correlated well with IVUS measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:1106 / 1114
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]   High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: Comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US [J].
Schoenberg, SO ;
Rieger, J ;
Weber, CH ;
Michaely, HJ ;
Waggershauser, T ;
Ittrich, C ;
Dietrich, O ;
Reiser, MF .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) :687-698
[22]   Automatic lumen and outer wall segmentation of the carotid artery using deformable three-dimensional models in MR angiography and vessel wall images [J].
van 't Klooster, Ronald ;
de Koning, Patrick J. H. ;
Dehnavi, Reza Alizadeh ;
Tamsma, Jouke T. ;
de Roos, Albert ;
Reiber, Johan H. C. ;
van der Geest, Rob J. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 35 (01) :156-165
[23]   Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis [J].
Vasbinder, GBC ;
Nelemans, PJ ;
Kessels, AGH ;
Kroon, AA ;
Maki, JH ;
Leiner, T ;
Beek, FJA ;
Korst, MBJM ;
Flobbe, K ;
de Haan, MW ;
van Zwam, WH ;
Postma, CT ;
Hunink, M ;
de Leeuw, PW ;
van Engelshoven, JMA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (09) :674-682
[24]   Reproducibility of Semi-Automated Measurement of Carotid Stenosis on CTA [J].
White, Jeremy H. ;
Bartlett, Eric S. ;
Bharatha, Aditya ;
Aviv, Richard I. ;
Fox, Allan J. ;
Thompson, Andrew L. ;
Bitar, Richard ;
Symons, Sean P. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 37 (04) :498-503
[25]   Renal Artery Stenosis: Imaging Options, Pitfalls, and Concerns [J].
Zhang, Hong Lei ;
Sos, Thomas A. ;
Winchester, Priscilla A. ;
Gao, Jing ;
Prince, Martin R. .
PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2009, 52 (03) :209-219