Amniocentesis and the risk of second trimester fetal loss in twin pregnancies: results from a prospective observational study

被引:13
作者
Lenis-Cordoba, Natalia [1 ]
Angeles Sanchez, Maria [1 ]
Carlos Bello-Munoz, Juan [2 ]
Sagala-Martinez, Juan [1 ]
Campos, Nazareth [1 ]
Carreras-Moratonas, Elena [2 ]
Cabero-Roura, Lluis [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Prenatal Diag Unit, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fetal Med Unit, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Vall dHebron Univ Hosp, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Amniocentesis; pregnancy loss; twin gestation; 2ND-TRIMESTER AMNIOCENTESIS; GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; GESTATIONS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2013.791271
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare the rate of pregnancy loss between twin pregnancies undergoing a genetic amniocentesis (AC) and a control group with similar characteristics. Methods: Prospective observational study on a population of twin pregnancies referred to our prenatal diagnosis unit for screening from 1990 to 2010. Those women referred for an AC were compared with those without indication for the procedure. Primary outcomes were pregnancy loss within the 4 weeks after procedure and pregnancy loss before 24 weeks. Secondary outcome included neonatal morbidity, gestational age at delivery and birth weight. Results: Maternal characteristics were similar for both groups, except for maternal age. There was neither difference in the pregnancy loss rate within 4 weeks (2.7 versus 2.6%) nor in the loss rate before 24 weeks of gestation (1.2 versus 1.1%). Gestational age at birth was 36 weeks for both groups. Chorionicity and gestational age at procedure played no role in modifying the risk. Conclusion: Based on our results, there is no difference in the pregnancy loss rate in twin gestations, regardless of chorionicity or gestational age at procedure, either within 4 weeks after the procedure or before 24 weeks, in patients who undergo AC when compared with patients who do not.
引用
收藏
页码:1537 / 1541
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS IN MULTIPLE GESTATION - 20 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH AMNIOCENTESIS [J].
ANDERSON, RL ;
GOLDBERG, JD ;
GOLBUS, MS .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1991, 11 (04) :263-270
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Obstetrics Gynecology, V110, P1459, DOI DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000291570.63450.44
[3]  
Anthony O, 2008, OBSTET GYNECOL, V111, P589
[4]   Second-trimester amniocentesis vs. chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis in multiple gestations [J].
Antsaklis, A ;
Souka, AP ;
Daskalakis, G ;
Kavalakis, Y ;
Michalas, S .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 20 (05) :476-481
[5]   PRENATAL KARYOTYPING OF TWINS BY ULTRASONICALLY GUIDED AMNIOCENTESIS [J].
BANG, J ;
NIELSEN, H ;
PHILIP, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1975, 123 (07) :695-696
[6]   2ND TRIMESTER AMNIOCENTESIS IN TWIN PREGNANCIES - MATERNAL HEMOGLOBIN AS A DYE MARKER TO DIFFERENTIATE DIAMNIOTIC TWINS [J].
BEEKHUIS, JR ;
DEBRUIJN, HWA ;
VANLITH, JMM ;
MANTINGH, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1992, 99 (02) :126-127
[7]  
CAHILL A, 2009, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V200
[8]  
Dena T, 2007, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V196
[9]  
Edozien LC, 1997, INT J CLIN PRACT, V51, P305
[10]   THE RISK OF 2ND-TRIMESTER AMNIOCENTESIS IN TWIN GESTATIONS - A CASE-CONTROL STUDY [J].
GHIDINI, A ;
LYNCH, L ;
HICKS, C ;
ALVAREZ, M ;
LOCKWOOD, CJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 169 (04) :1013-1016