Advances in Statistical Methods for Causal Inference in Prevention Science: Introduction to the Special Section

被引:3
作者
Wiedermann, Wolfgang [1 ]
Dong, Nianbo [2 ]
von Eye, Alexander [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Stat Measurement & Evaluat Educ, Dept Educ Sch & Counselling Psychol, Coll Educ, 13B Hill Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Propensity score techniques; Causal mediation; Direction dependence analysis; Causal structure learning; Granger causality; MEDIATION; DIRECTION; FRAMEWORK; MODELS; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1007/s11121-019-0978-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The board of the Society for Prevention Research noted recently that extant methods for the analysis of causality mechanisms in prevention may still be too rudimentary for detailed and sophisticated analysis of causality hypotheses. This Special Section aims to fill some of the current voids, in particular in the domain of statistical methods of the analysis of causal inference. In the first article, Bray et al. propose a novel methodological approach in which they link propensity score techniques and Latent Class Analysis. In the second article, Kelcey et al. discuss power analysis tools for the study of causal mediation effects in cluster-randomized interventions. Wiedermann et al. present, in the third article, methods of Direction Dependence Analysis for the identification of confounders and for inference concerning the direction of causal effects in mediation models. A more general approach to the identification of causal structures in non-experimental data is presented by Shimizu in the fourth article. This approach is based on linear non-Gaussian acyclic models. Molenaar introduces vector-autoregressive methods for the optimal representation of Granger causality in time-dependent data. The Special Section concludes with a commentary by Musci and Stuart. In this commentary, the contributions of the articles in the Special Section are highlighted from the perspective of the experimental causal research tradition.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 393
页数:4
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, Statistics and causality, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118947074.CH16
  • [2] The Application of Intensive Longitudinal Methods to Investigate Change: Stimulating the Field of Applied Family Research
    Bamberger, Katharine T.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHILD AND FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 19 (01) : 21 - 38
  • [3] Bridging the Nomothetic and Idiographic Approaches to the Analysis of Clinical Data
    Beltz, Adriene M.
    Wright, Aidan G. C.
    Sprague, Briana N.
    Molenaar, Peter C. M.
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2016, 23 (04) : 447 - 458
  • [4] Bolger N., 2013, Intensive longitudinal methods: an introduction to diary and experience sampling research
  • [5] Inverse Propensity Score Weighting with a Latent Class Exposure: Estimating the Causal Effect of Reported Reasons for Alcohol Use on Problem Alcohol Use 16Years Later
    Bray, Bethany C.
    Dziak, John J.
    Patrick, Megan E.
    Lanza, Stephanie T.
    [J]. PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2019, 20 (03) : 394 - 406
  • [6] A Framework for Estimating Causal Effects in Latent Class Analysis: Is There a Causal Link Between Early Sex and Subsequent Profiles of Delinquency?
    Butera, Nicole M.
    Lanza, Stephanie T.
    Coffman, Donna L.
    [J]. PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2014, 15 (03) : 397 - 407
  • [7] The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change
    Chambers, David A.
    Glasgow, Russell E.
    Stange, Kurt C.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2013, 8
  • [8] PowerUp!: A Tool for Calculating Minimum Detectable Effect Sizes and Minimum Required Sample Sizes for Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design Studies
    Dong, Nianbo
    Maynard, Rebecca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, 2013, 6 (01) : 24 - 67
  • [9] Standards of Evidence for Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Scale-up Research in Prevention Science: Next Generation
    Gottfredson, Denise C.
    Cook, Thomas D.
    Gardner, Frances E. M.
    Gorman-Smith, Deborah
    Howe, George W.
    Sandler, Irwin N.
    Zafft, Kathryn M.
    [J]. PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2015, 16 (07) : 893 - 926
  • [10] INVESTIGATING CAUSAL RELATIONS BY ECONOMETRIC MODELS AND CROSS-SPECTRAL METHODS
    GRANGER, CWJ
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1969, 37 (03) : 424 - 438