Handling actuator magnitude and rate saturation in uncertain over-actuated systems: a modified projection algorithm approach

被引:10
作者
Tohidi, Seyed Shahabaldin [1 ]
Yildiz, Yildiray [1 ]
机构
[1] Bilkent Univ, Fac Mech Engn, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Projection algorithm; adaptive systems; actuator saturation; control allocation; CONTROL ALLOCATION; STABLE ADAPTATION; FLIGHT CONTROL; CONSTRAINTS; AMPLITUDE; TRACKING;
D O I
10.1080/00207179.2020.1823019
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a projection algorithm which can be employed to bound actuator signals, in terms of both magnitude and rate, for uncertain systems with redundant actuators. The investigated closed-loop control system is assumed to contain an adaptive control allocator to distribute the total control input among actuators. Although conventional control allocation methods can handle actuator rate and magnitude constraints, they cannot consider actuator uncertainty. On the other hand, adaptive allocators manage uncertainty and actuator magnitude limits. The proposed projection algorithm enables adaptive control allocators to handle both magnitude and rate saturation constraints. A mathematically rigorous analysis is provided to show that with the help of the proposed projection algorithm, the performance of the adaptive control allocator can be guaranteed, in terms of error bounds. Simulation results are presented, where the Aero-Data Model In Research Environment (ADMIRE) is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 803
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Piloted Evaluation of a Control Allocation Technique to Recover from Pilot-Induced Oscillations
    Acosta, Diana M.
    Yildiz, Yildiray
    Craun, Robert W.
    Beard, Steven D.
    Leonard, Michael W.
    Hardy, Gordon H.
    Weinstein, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2015, 52 (01): : 130 - 140
  • [2] Flight control for mixed-amplitude commands
    Buffington, JM
    Enns, DF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1997, 68 (06) : 1209 - 1229
  • [3] CONSTRAINED CONTROL ALLOCATION
    DURHAM, WC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1993, 16 (04) : 717 - 725
  • [4] Falconi GP, 2016, P AMER CONTR CONF, P6760, DOI 10.1109/ACC.2016.7526736
  • [5] Gaudio J. E., 2019, ARXIV190711913
  • [6] Gruenwald B.C., 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, P1424
  • [7] Resolving actuator redundancy -: optimal control vs. control allocation
    Härkegård, O
    Glad, ST
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 2005, 41 (01) : 137 - 144
  • [8] Härkegård O, 2002, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P1295, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2002.1184694
  • [9] Optimal constrained control allocation in marine surface vessels with rudders
    Johansen, Tor A.
    Fugseth, Thomas P.
    Tondel, Petter
    Fossen, Thor I.
    [J]. CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2008, 16 (04) : 457 - 464
  • [10] Control allocation A-survey
    Johansen, Tor A.
    Fossen, Thor I.
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 2013, 49 (05) : 1087 - 1103