Identifying and Assessing the Application of Ecosystem Services Approaches in Environmental Policies and Decision Making

被引:29
作者
Van Wensem, Joke [1 ]
Calow, Peter [2 ]
Dollacker, Annik [3 ]
Maltby, Lorraine [4 ]
Olander, Lydia [5 ]
Tuvendal, Magnus [6 ]
Van Houtven, George [7 ]
机构
[1] Minist Infrastruct & Environm, Soil Protect Tech Comm, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Univ Minnesota, Humphrey Sch Publ Affairs, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Bayer AG, Crop Sci Div, Monheim, Germany
[4] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[5] Duke Univ, Nicholas Inst Environm Policy Solut, Durham, NC USA
[6] Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] RTI Int, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
关键词
Ecosystem services; Decision-making; Criteria Policies; BENEFIT TRANSFER; PROTECTION; VALUATION; FRAMEWORK; EXPERIENCES; GOVERNANCE; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.1836
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The presumption is that ecosystem services (ES) approaches provide a better basis for environmental decision making than do other approaches because they make explicit the connection between human well-being and ecosystem structures and processes. However, the existing literature does not provide a precise description of ES approaches for environmental policy and decision making, nor does it assess whether these applications will make a difference in terms of changing decisions and improving outcomes. We describe 3 criteria that can be used to identify whether and to what extent ES approaches are being applied: 1) connect impacts all the way from ecosystem changes to human well-being, 2) consider all relevant ES affected by the decision, and 3) consider and compare the changes in well-being of different stakeholders. As a demonstration, we then analyze retrospectively whether and how the criteria were met in different decision-making contexts. For this assessment, we have developed an analysis format that describes the type of policy, the relevant scales, the decisions or questions, the decision maker, and the underlying documents. This format includes a general judgment of how far the 3 ES criteria have been applied. It shows that the criteria can be applied to many different decision-making processes, ranging from the supranational to the local scale and to different parts of decision-making processes. In conclusion we suggest these criteria could be used for assessments of the extent to which ES approaches have been and should be applied, what benefits and challenges arise, and whether using ES approaches made a difference in the decision-making process, decisions made, or outcomes of those decisions. Results from such studies could inform future use and development of ES approaches, draw attention to where the greatest benefits and challenges are, and help to target integration of ES approaches into policies, where they can be most effective. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017; 13: 41-51. (C) 2016 SETAC.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 51
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters
    Aagaard, Alf
    Brock, Theo
    Capri, Ettore
    Duquesne, Sabine
    Filipic, Metka
    Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio F.
    Hirsch-Ernst, Karen I.
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Klein, Michael
    Kuhl, Thomas
    Laskowski, Ryszard
    Liess, Matthias
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Ockleford, Colin
    Ossendorp, Bernadette
    Pickford, Daniel
    Smith, Robert
    Sousa, Paulo
    Sundh, Ingvar
    Tiktak, Aaldrik
    Van der Linden, Ton
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2013, 11 (07)
  • [2] Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation
    Andam, Kwaw S.
    Ferraro, Paul J.
    Pfaff, Alexander
    Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. Arturo
    Robalino, Juan A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (42) : 16089 - 16094
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, EFSA Journal, V8, P1821, DOI DOI 10.2903/J.EFSA.2010.1821
  • [5] Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Harwood, Amii R.
    Mace, Georgina M.
    Watson, Robert T.
    Abson, David J.
    Andrews, Barnaby
    Binner, Amy
    Crowe, Andrew
    Day, Brett H.
    Dugdale, Steve
    Fezzi, Carlo
    Foden, Jo
    Hadley, David
    Haines-Young, Roy
    Hulme, Mark
    Kontoleon, Andreas
    Lovett, Andrew A.
    Munday, Paul
    Pascual, Unai
    Paterson, James
    Perino, Grischa
    Sen, Antara
    Siriwardena, Gavin
    van Soest, Daan
    Termansen, Mette
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6141) : 45 - 50
  • [6] Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Mace, Georgina M.
    Fezzi, Carlo
    Atkinson, Giles
    Turner, Kerry
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 48 (02) : 177 - 218
  • [7] Bear D, 2014, FEDERAL RESOURCE MAN, P1
  • [8] ISSUES IN ECOSYSTEM VALUATION - IMPROVING INFORMATION FOR DECISION-MAKING
    BINGHAM, G
    BISHOP, R
    BRODY, M
    BROMLEY, D
    CLARK, E
    COOPER, W
    COSTANZA, R
    HALE, T
    HAYDEN, G
    KELLERT, S
    NORGAARD, R
    NORTON, B
    PAYNE, J
    RUSSELL, C
    SUTER, G
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 14 (02) : 73 - 90
  • [9] What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units
    Boyd, James
    Banzhaf, Spencer
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) : 616 - 626
  • [10] Using Ecological Production Functions to Link Ecological Processes to Ecosystem Services
    Bruins, Randall J. F.
    Canfield, Timothy J.
    Duke, Clifford
    Kapustka, Larry
    Nahlik, Amanda M.
    Schaefer, Ralf B.
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 13 (01) : 52 - 61