Methodological characteristics and quality of alcohol treatment outcome studies, 1970-98: an expanded evaluation

被引:35
作者
Moyer, A [1 ]
Finney, JW
Swearingen, CE
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] VA Palo Alto Health Care Syst, Ctr Hlth Care Evaluat, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Ctr Med, Menlo Pk, CA USA
关键词
alcohol; methodological quality; treatment;
D O I
10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00017.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims To examine the methodological quality of the research literature examining treatment for alcohol use disorders. Design In total. 701 studies first reported between 1970 and 1998 were evaluated with a scoring system covering 19 areas of research quality. Findings Methodological quality improved from a score of 8.2 out of a possible 28.5 in the 1970s, to 10.6 in the 1990s. Strengths included reporting the initial number of participants and conducting follow-ups of 12 months or longer. Although the percentage of studies with adequate power also increased overall. the average statistical power of comparative studies to detect a medium-sized treatment effect was low (0.54). Conclusions Areas with room for improvement include: ensuring that follow-up data are collected when respondents are not under the influence of alcohol, testing for differential dropout among treatment groups with respect to participant background characteristics, reporting the number of individuals being treated in the programs from which samples are drawn. noting the reliability and validity of measures used and conducting process analyses to examine potential mechanisms underlying treatment effects.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 263
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Aggregate-level predictors of the prevalence of selected drinking patterns in multiple studies: A research synthesis from the collaborative alcohol-related longitudinal project [J].
Ager, CR ;
Ferrer, HP ;
Fillmore, KM ;
Golding, JM ;
Leino, EV ;
Motoyoshi, M .
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 1996, 31 (11-12) :1503-1523
[2]  
[Anonymous], TREATING ADDICTIVE B
[3]   ISSUES IN THE DEFINITION AND MEASUREMENT OF DRINKING OUTCOMES IN ALCOHOLISM-TREATMENT RESEARCH [J].
BABOR, TF ;
LONGABAUGH, R ;
ZWEBEN, A ;
FULLER, RK ;
STOUT, RL ;
ANTON, RF ;
RANDALL, CL .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 1994, :101-111
[4]   Talk is cheap: Measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials [J].
Babor, TF ;
Steinberg, K ;
Anton, R ;
Del Boca, F .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2000, 61 (01) :55-63
[5]   Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement [J].
Begg, C ;
Cho, M ;
Eastwood, S ;
Horton, R ;
Moher, D ;
Olkin, I ;
Pitkin, R ;
Rennie, D ;
Schulz, KF ;
Simel, D ;
Stroup, DF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08) :637-639
[6]   BRIEF INTERVENTIONS FOR ALCOHOL-PROBLEMS - A REVIEW [J].
BIEN, TH ;
MILLER, WR ;
TONIGAN, JS .
ADDICTION, 1993, 88 (03) :315-336
[7]   Alcohol treatment outcome methodology: State of the art 1989-1993 [J].
Breslin, FC ;
Sobell, SL ;
Sobell, LC ;
Sobell, MB .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1997, 22 (02) :145-155
[8]  
Carroll KM, 1997, ALCOHOL HEALTH RES W, V21, P352
[9]   A METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL [J].
CHALMERS, TC ;
SMITH, H ;
BLACKBURN, B ;
SILVERMAN, B ;
SCHROEDER, B ;
REITMAN, D ;
AMBROZ, A .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1981, 2 (01) :31-49
[10]  
CHALMERS TC, 1989, INT J TECHNOL ASSESS, V5, P31