MPA policy: What lies behind the science?

被引:45
作者
Caveen, Alex J. [1 ]
Gray, Tim S. [2 ]
Stead, Selina M. [1 ]
Polunin, Nicholas V. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Marine Sci & Technol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Geog Polit & Sociol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Marine protected areas; Marine reserves; Science-policy; Epistemic communities; Advocacy coalitions; Discourse coalitions; MARINE PROTECTED AREAS; ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK; EPISTEMIC COMMUNITIES; RESERVES; FISHERIES; IMPACTS; BIODIVERSITY; BENEFITS; BIOMASS; FISH;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2012.04.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
What the current policy debate on marine protected areas (MPAs) and marine reserves (MRs) has failed to address is the fact that protection of the marine environment has as much to do with scientists, and others values as it has to do with science. To date natural science has played a dominant role in the implementation of MPAs, yet normative considerations which are embedded in the way scientists and the wider community think about the condition the marine environment should be in, and which may influence decision-making, are rarely acknowledged or discussed. This paper seeks to correct that deficiency by investigating the values that lie behind the natural science of MPAs. With the aid of epistemic community, advocacy coalition and discourse coalition theories of policy networks, this article explores the role science and scientists have played in influencing policy on MPAs at the global and national level, and looks at the extent to which normative conceptualisations within and beyond natural science have influenced the debate. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 10
页数:8
相关论文
共 84 条
[11]  
Caveen AJ, 2012, ENVIRON CONSERV, V39, P1
[12]   Marine reserves and the precautionary management of fisheries [J].
Clark, CW .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (02) :369-370
[13]   ENVIRONMENTAL-EFFECTS OF MARINE FISHING [J].
DAYTON, PK ;
THRUSH, SF ;
AGARDY, MT ;
HOFMAN, RJ .
AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 1995, 5 (03) :205-232
[14]  
Dryzek J.S., 1997, POLITICS EARTH
[15]   Does the global network of marine protected areas provide an adequate safety net for marine biodiversity? [J].
Edgar, Graham J. .
AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2011, 21 (04) :313-316
[16]   Restored top carnivores as detriments to the performance of marine protected areas intended for fishery sustainability: A case study with red abalones and sea otters [J].
Fanshawe, S ;
VanBlaricom, GR ;
Shelly, AA .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2003, 17 (01) :273-283
[17]  
Fischer F., 2003, Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices
[18]   Habitat patches that cross marine reserve boundaries: consequences for the lobster Jasus edwardsii [J].
Freeman, Debbie J. ;
MacDiarmid, Alison B. ;
Taylor, Richard B. .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2009, 388 :159-167
[19]   Food security and marine capture fisheries: characteristics, trends, drivers and future perspectives [J].
Garcia, Serge M. ;
Rosenberg, Andrew A. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 365 (1554) :2869-2880
[20]   Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves [J].
Gell, FR ;
Roberts, CM .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (09) :448-455