Natural language processing in text mining for structural modeling of protein complexes

被引:25
作者
Badal, Varsha D.
Kundrotas, Petras J. [1 ]
Vakser, Ilya A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Ctr Computat Biol, Lawrence, KS 66047 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Protein interactions; Binding site prediction; Protein docking; Dependency parser; Rule-based system; Supervised learning; BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE; EXTRACTION; INFORMATION; DATABASE; DOCKING;
D O I
10.1186/s12859-018-2079-4
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Structural modeling of protein-protein interactions produces a large number of putative configurations of the protein complexes. Identification of the near-native models among them is a serious challenge. Publicly available results of biomedical research may provide constraints on the binding mode, which can be essential for the docking. Our text-mining (TM) tool, which extracts binding site residues from the PubMed abstracts, was successfully applied to protein docking (Badal et al., PLoS Comput Biol, 2015; 11: e1004630). Still, many extracted residues were not relevant to the docking. Results: We present an extension of the TM tool, which utilizes natural language processing (NLP) for analyzing the context of the residue occurrence. The procedure was tested using generic and specialized dictionaries. The results showed that the keyword dictionaries designed for identification of protein interactions are not adequate for the TM prediction of the binding mode. However, our dictionary designed to distinguish keywords relevant to the protein binding sites led to considerable improvement in the TM performance. We investigated the utility of several methods of context analysis, based on dissection of the sentence parse trees. The machine learning-based NLP filtered the pool of the mined residues significantly more efficiently than the rule-based NLP. Constraints generated by NLP were tested in docking of unbound proteins from the DOCKGROUND X-ray benchmark set 4. The output of the global low-resolution docking scan was post-processed, separately, by constraints from the basic TM, constraints re-ranked by NLP, and the reference constraints. The quality of a match was assessed by the interface root-mean-square deviation. The results showed significant improvement of the docking output when using the constraints generated by the advanced TM with NLP. Conclusions: The basic TM procedure for extracting protein-protein binding site residues from the PubMed abstracts was significantly advanced by the deep parsing (NLP techniques for contextual analysis) in purging of the initial pool of the extracted residues. Benchmarking showed a substantial increase of the docking success rate based on the constraints generated by the advanced TM with NLP.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, WordNet, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/7287.001.0001
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, COLING 2008 P WORKSH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, P 42 ANN M ASS COMP
[4]   Text Mining for Protein Docking [J].
Badal, Varsha D. ;
Kundrotas, Petras J. ;
Vakser, Ilya A. .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2015, 11 (12)
[5]  
Banerjee S., 2002, Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. Third International Conference, CICLing 2002. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol.2276), P136
[6]  
Banerjee S., 2003, P 18 INT JOINT C ART, P805
[7]  
Blaschke C, 2002, IEEE INTELL SYST, V17, P14, DOI 10.1109/MIS.2002.999215
[8]  
Blaschke C, 1999, Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol, P60
[9]   Negatome 2.0: a database of non-interacting proteins derived by literature mining, manual annotation and protein structure analysis [J].
Blohm, Philipp ;
Frishman, Goar ;
Smialowski, Pawel ;
Goebels, Florian ;
Wachinger, Benedikt ;
Ruepp, Andreas ;
Frishman, Dmitrij .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2014, 42 (D1) :D396-D400
[10]  
Bunescu R., 2005, P NIPS 2005 VANC BC, P171