Surgical resection for esophageal carcinoma: Speaking the language

被引:4
作者
Korst, Robert J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Div Thorac Surg, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Med Genet, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Esophageal carcinoma; Terminology;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v11.i15.2211
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The terminology used to describe esophagectomy for carcinoma can be confusing, even for specialists in gastrointestinal disease. As a result, specific terms are often used out of their intended context. To simplify the nomenclature, two points regarding procedures for surgical resection of the esophagus are critical: the extent of resection (radical vs standard) and the operative approach (choice of incisions). It is important to understand that the radicality of the resection may have little to do with the operative approach, with the exception of esophagectomy without thoracotomy (transhiatal esophagectomy), which mandates the performance of a standard or non-radical resection. Esophagectomy has emerged as the standard curative treatment option for patients with esophageal carcinoma; however, unlike the surgical resection of other types of solid tumors, many different surgical options and/or approaches exist for these patients. This heterogeneity of care may result from the fact that the esophagus is accessible through more than one body cavity (left hemithorax, right hemithorax, abdomen). In addition, and partially as a result of its accessibility, different types of surgical specialists harbor this operation in their armamentarium, including general surgeons, thoracic surgeons, and surgical oncologists. Despite this enthusiasm amongst surgeons, little consensus exists as to which option is most oncologically sound. Further, the details of the various surgical approaches and procedures for resection of the esophagus are often difficult to comprehend, even for specialists in gastrointestinal disease, with much of the relevant terminology used out of its intended context. To facilitate the understanding of the surgical options for esophageal carcinoma, it is useful to view the operation from two angles: the extent of resection (Aradical@ vs Astandard@) and the operative approach (choice of incisions). (C) 2005 The WJG Press and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2211 / 2212
页数:2
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   RADICAL LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION FOR CANCER OF THE THORACIC ESOPHAGUS [J].
AKIYAMA, H ;
TSURUMARU, M ;
UDAGAWA, H ;
KAJIYAMA, Y .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 220 (03) :364-373
[2]   En bloc esophagectomy improves survival for stage III esophageal cancer [J].
Altorki, NK ;
Girardi, L ;
Skinner, DB .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 114 (06) :948-955
[3]   Occult cervical nodal metastasis in esophageal cancer: Preliminary results of three-field lymphadenectomy [J].
Altorki, NK ;
Skinner, DB .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 113 (03) :540-544
[4]  
Altorki NK, 2002, ESOPHAGEAL SURG, P866
[5]   Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus [J].
Hulscher, JBF ;
van Sandick, JW ;
de Boer, AGEM ;
Wijnhoven, BPL ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Fockens, P ;
Stalmeier, PFM ;
ten Kate, FJW ;
van Dekken, H ;
Obertop, H ;
Tilanus, HW ;
van Lanschot, JJB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (21) :1662-1669
[6]   Stage II esophageal carcinoma: The significance of T and N [J].
Killinger, WA ;
Rice, TW ;
Adelstein, DJ ;
Medendorp, SV ;
Zuccaro, G ;
Kirby, TJ ;
Goldblum, JR .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 111 (05) :935-939
[8]   TOTAL 3-STAGE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER OF ESOPHAGUS [J].
MCKEOWN, KC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1976, 63 (04) :259-262
[9]   TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR BENIGN AND MALIGNANT DISEASE [J].
ORRINGER, MB ;
MARSHALL, B ;
STIRLING, MC ;
PEARSON, FG ;
GINSBERG, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1993, 105 (02) :265-277
[10]  
SKINNER DB, 1983, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V85, P59