Case volume and outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a nationwide Austrian benchmarking project

被引:119
作者
Kapral, C. [1 ]
Duller, C. [2 ]
Wewalka, F. [1 ]
Kerstan, E. [3 ]
Vogel, W. [4 ]
Schreiber, F. [5 ]
机构
[1] Konventhosp Barmherzige Brueder, Dept Med, A-4021 Linz, Austria
[2] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Dept Appl Stat, Fac Social & Econ Sci, A-4040 Linz, Austria
[3] Wilhelminenspital Stadt Wien, Dept Med 4, Vienna, Austria
[4] Med Univ Innsbruck, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Innsbruck, Austria
[5] Med Univ Graz, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Graz, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2008-1077461
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aim: In a quality assessment project for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), initiated in 2006 by the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, benchmark data were collected on a voluntary basis. Results from the individual participating centers, both academic and community-based, were compared with pooled benchmark data, with the intention that individual problems should be identified and corrected in order to improve patient care in Austria. Success and complication rates in nonselected patients were evaluated, especially with regard to case Volume. Methods: In Austria, with a population of 8 million, 140 sites are registered for ERCP, and it is estimated that up to 15000 procedures are done annually. Of these sites, 28 participated in the "Benchmarking ERCP" project during the first year, reporting on 3132 procedures, or 22% of the total number. Results: The overall complication rate in nonselected patients was 12.6%, consisting of post-ERCP pancreatitis (5.1%), bleeding (3.7%), cholangitis (1.9%), cardiopulmonary complications (0.9%), and perforation (0.5%); procedure-related mortality was 0.1%. The overall therapeutic and diagnostic target was achieved in 84.8%. High case volume (endoscopists performing > 50 vs. < 50 ERCPs per year; 21 vs. 68 endoscopists) was associated with significantly higher success (86.9% vs. 80.3%, P < 0.001) and lower overall complication rates (10.2% vs. 13.6%, P=0.007); significance was not reached for all subgroups of complications. Conclusion: Success and complication rates for ERCP in Austria are comparable to those reported elsewhere. In our study, endoscopists with a case volume exceeding 50 ERCPs per year had higher success and lower overall complication rates.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 630
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Measuring clinical information technology in the ICU setting: Application in a quality improvement collaborative [J].
Amarasingham, Ruben ;
Pronovost, Peter J. ;
Diener-West, Marie ;
Goeschel, Christine ;
Dorman, Todd ;
Thiemann, David R. ;
Powe, Neil R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2007, 14 (03) :288-294
[2]   Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: A systematic survey of prospective studies [J].
Andriulli, Angelo ;
Loperfido, Silvano ;
Napolitano, Grazia ;
Niro, Grazia ;
Valvano, Maria Rosa ;
Spirito, Fulvio ;
Pilotto, Alberto ;
Forlano, Rosario .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (08) :1781-1788
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Gastrintest Endosc
[4]  
Appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2000, Gastrointest Endosc, V52, P831
[5]   Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [J].
Baron, TH ;
Petersen, BT ;
Mergener, K ;
Chak, A ;
Cohen, J ;
Deal, SE ;
Hoffinan, B ;
Jacobson, BC ;
Petrini, JL ;
Safdi, MA ;
Faigel, DO ;
Pike, IM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (04) :892-897
[6]   Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: Results from a single tertiary referral center [J].
Barthet, M ;
Lesavre, N ;
Desjeux, A ;
Gasmi, M ;
Berthezene, P ;
Berdah, S ;
Viviand, X ;
Grimaud, JC .
ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 34 (12) :991-997
[7]   Complications of ERCP: a prospective study [J].
Christensen, M ;
Matzen, P ;
Schulze, S ;
Rosenberg, J .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (05) :721-731
[8]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS [J].
COTTON, PB ;
LEHMAN, G ;
VENNES, J ;
GEENEN, JE ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
MEYERS, WC ;
LIGUORY, C ;
NICKL, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) :383-393
[9]   ERCP is most dangerous for people who need it least [J].
Cotton, PB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (04) :535-536
[10]   Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: An introduction [J].
Faigel, DO ;
Pike, IM ;
Baron, TH ;
Chak, A ;
Cohen, J ;
Deal, SE ;
Hoffman, B ;
Jacobson, BC ;
Mergener, K ;
Petersen, BT ;
Petrini, JL ;
Rex, DK ;
Safdi, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (04) :866-872