Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: Some Arguments for Mixed Methods Research

被引:64
作者
Lund, Thorleif [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Special Needs Educ, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
关键词
mixed methods; qualitative-quantitative combination; evaluation design; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1080/00313831.2011.568674
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
One purpose of the present paper is to elaborate 4 general advantages of the mixed methods approach. Another purpose is to propose a 5-phase evaluation design, and to demonstrate its usefulness for mixed methods research. The account is limited to research on groups in need of treatment, i.e., vulnerable groups, and the advantages of mixed methods are illustrated by the help of the 5-phase evaluation design. The basic idea is that the total set of relevant attributes and changes for such a vulnerable group should be taken into consideration in all phases, and that the mixed methods approach will provide an optimal treatment, will give a more complete description and understanding of the treatment effects, and will facilitate generalization to professional work.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 165
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Arguments for 'British Pluralism' in qualitative health research
    Johnson, M
    Long, T
    White, A
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 33 (02) : 243 - 249
  • [42] Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT)
    Hong, Quan Nha
    Gonzalez-Reyes, Araceli
    Pluye, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (03) : 459 - 467
  • [43] Novel Methods for Leveraging Large Cohort Studies for Qualitative and Mixed-Methods Research
    Nguyen, Katie Truc Nhat H.
    Stuart, Jennifer J.
    Shah, Aarushi H.
    Becene, Iris A.
    West, Madeline G.
    Berrill, Jane
    Gelaye, Bizu
    Borba, Christina P. C.
    Rich-Edwards, Janet W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 192 (05) : 821 - 829
  • [44] BEHAVIOURAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN WORKING MEMORY: MIXING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS
    de los Angeles Bacigalupe, Maria
    Paula Tujague, Maria
    Spath, Griselda M.
    Blas Lahitte, Hector
    LIBERABIT-REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA, 2013, 19 (02): : 195 - 203
  • [45] The Critical Role Qualitative Research Plays in Service to High Quality Mixed Methods Research
    Chudzik, Mia
    Corr, Catherine
    TOPICS IN EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2023,
  • [46] How qualitative research methods can be leveraged to strengthen mixed methods research in public policy and public administration?
    Hendren, Kathryn
    Newcomer, Kathryn
    Pandey, Sanjay K.
    Smith, Margaret
    Sumner, Nicole
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2023, 83 (03) : 468 - 485
  • [47] Editorial: Best Practice Approaches for Mixed Methods Research in Psychological Science
    Anguera, M. Teresa
    Blanco-Villasenor, Angel
    Jonsson, Gudberg K.
    Losada, Jose Luis
    Portell, Mariona
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [48] Development of the ASSESS tool: a comprehenSive tool to Support rEporting and critical appraiSal of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods implementation reSearch outcomes
    Ryan, Nessa
    Vieira, Dorice
    Gyamfi, Joyce
    Ojo, Temitope
    Shelley, Donna
    Ogedegbe, Olugbenga
    Iwelunmor, Juliet
    Peprah, Emmanuel
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 3 (01):
  • [49] Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Data Collection and Analysis Methods in Understanding Multiple Sclerosis Fatigue Management
    Turpin, Merrill J.
    Asano, Miho
    Finlayson, Marcia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2015, 14 (02):
  • [50] Evaluating Mixed Research Studies: A Mixed Methods Approach
    Leech, Nancy L.
    Dellinger, Amy B.
    Brannagan, Kim B.
    Tanaka, Hideyuki
    JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2010, 4 (01) : 17 - 31