The results of the Swiss observational study of the new, fast-dissolving mirtazapine formulation in depressed patients

被引:5
作者
Delini-Stula, Alexandra [1 ]
Bischof, Roland [1 ]
机构
[1] ADI Int Inst Advancement Drug Dev, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
depression; antidepressants; NaSSA; mirtazapine; clinical trials; new formulations;
D O I
10.1080/13651500600579175
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective. The purpose of the present study was to document the experience with the use of a new, fast-dissolving oral tablet (FDT, RemeronSolTab(R)) of mirtazapine, a NaSSA antidepressant, in the treatment of depressed patients in daily practice in Switzerland. Methods. It was an open, prospective collection of observations in a total of 1121 depressive patients ( > 18 years old, both sexes). The treatment duration was 8 weeks with assessments after the second and eighth week. Efficacy measures were CGI ( seven points) and specific check-lists for the ratings of severity of anxiety and sleep disturbances. At the end of the trial the acceptance (eight-item questionnaire) of the new formulation was recorded too. Results. The results showed that there was highly significant (P< 0.001) and rapid improvement of severity of depression, anxiety and sleep disturbances in the whole population. Subgroup analyses showed that the antidepressant efficacy was independent of gender, initial severity of depression or of the type of depression ( first episode, recurrent, chronic depression). The majority of patients (80%) liked at least one of the properties of FDT and, out of 75% of patients having experience with conventional tablet, 50% stated to be better compliant with this new formulation. Conclusion. This report documents the antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine FDT. The new formulation found good acceptance by the patients. The results also suggest a likelihood of improved compliance with the mirtazapine FDT.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 130
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Gender differences in treatment response to sertraline versus imipramine in patients with nonmelancholic depressive disorders [J].
Baca, E ;
Garcia-Garcia, M ;
Porras-Chavarino, A .
PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 28 (01) :57-65
[2]   Mirtazapine orally disintegrating tablet versus sertraline:: A prospective onset of action study [J].
Behnke, K ;
Sogaard, J ;
Martin, S ;
Bäuml, J ;
Ravindran, AV ;
Ågren, H ;
Vester-Blokland, ED .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 23 (04) :358-364
[3]   Mirtazapine compared with paroxetine in major depression [J].
Benkert, O ;
Szegedi, A ;
Kohnen, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 61 (09) :656-663
[4]  
Bies Robert R, 2003, J Gend Specif Med, V6, P12
[5]   Mirtazapine versus venlafaxine in hospitalized severely depressed patients with melancholic features [J].
Guelfi, JD ;
Ansseau, M ;
Timmerman, L ;
Korsgaard, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 21 (04) :425-431
[6]   Clinical efficacy of mirtazapine: A review of meta-analyses of pooled data [J].
Kasper, S .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 10 :25-35
[7]  
LAVERGNE F, 2004, NEUROPSYCHIATR DIS T, V1, P59
[8]   Efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine versus citalopram:: a double-blind, randomized study in patients with major depressive disorder [J].
Leinonen, E ;
Skarstein, J ;
Behnke, K ;
Ågren, H ;
Helsdingen, JT .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 14 (06) :329-337
[9]   Gender differences in the efficacy of fluoxetine and maprotiline in depressed patients:: a double-blind trial of antidepressants with serotonergic or norepinephrinergic reuptake inhibition profile [J].
Martényi, F ;
Dossenbach, M ;
Mraz, K ;
Metcalfe, S .
EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 11 (03) :227-232
[10]   A double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and doxepin in patients with major depression [J].
Marttila, M ;
Jaaskelainen, J ;
Jarvi, R ;
Romanov, M ;
Miettinen, E ;
Sorri, P ;
Ahlfors, U ;
Zivkov, M .
EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 5 (04) :441-446