Comparison of contingent valuation and choice experiment in solid waste management programs in Macao

被引：84

作者：

Jin, Jianjun ^{[1
]}

Wang, Zhishi

Ran, Shenghong

机构：

[1] Univ Macau, Fac Sci & Technol, Taipa, Macao, Peoples R China

[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China

来源：

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS | 2006年 / 57卷 / 03期

关键词：

choice experiment; contingent valuation; economic valuation; Macao; solid waste management;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.020

中图分类号：

Q14 [生态学（生物生态学）];

学科分类号：

071012 ; 0713 ;

摘要：

This study reports results from a double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation method (DC-CVM) and choice experiment (CE) study that aimed to examine Macao residents' preferences for alternative solid waste management policy changes in Macao. An empirical comparison of the welfare measures derived from the double-bounded DC-CVM and CE is conducted. There is no significant difference found between the values derived from the two methods. The results suggest that both double-bounded DC-CVM and CE can be successfully implemented for environmental valuation in Macao. This paper could provide the basis for further development of useful ideas on sustainable management of solid waste in Macao. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：430 / 441

页数：12

共 42 条

[1] ABOUALI H, 2003, 113 GOT U DEP EC SCH
[2] COMBINING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES
ADAMOWICZ, W
LOUVIERE, J
WILLIAMS, M
[J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (03) : 271 - 292
[3] Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation
Adamowicz, W
Boxall, P
Williams, M
Louviere, J
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) : 64 - 75
[4] The practice and challenges of solid waste management in Singapore
Bai, RB
Sutanto, M
[J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2002, 22 (05) : 557 - 567
[5] BISHOP RC, 1998, ENV RESOURCE VALUATI
[6] Yea-saying in contingent valuation surveys
Blamey, RK
Bennett, JW
Morrison, MD
[J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 1999, 75 (01) : 126 - 141
[7] A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation
Boxall, PC
Adamowicz, WL
Swait, J
Williams, M
Louviere, J
[J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (03) : 243 - 253
[8] Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments
Carlsson, F
Frykblom, P
Liljenstolpe, C
[J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 47 (01) : 95 - 103
[9] Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment
Carlsson, F
Martinsson, P
[J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 41 (02) : 179 - 192
[10] Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method

← 1 2 3 4 5 →