Immunosuppression: Evolution in practice and trends, 1994-2004

被引:380
作者
Meier-Kriesche, HU [1 ]
Li, S
Gruessner, RWG
Fung, JJ
Bustami, RT
Barr, ML
Leichtman, AB
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Renal Res & Educ Assoc, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[5] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
acute rejection; immunosuppression; induction therapy; maintenance immunosuppression; SRTR; transplantation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01270.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Over the last 10 years, there have been important changes in immunosuppression management and strategies for solid-organ transplantation, characterized by the use of new immunosuppressive agents and regimens. An organ-by-organ review of OPTN/SRTR data showed several important trends in immunosuppression practice. There is an increasing trend toward the use of induction therapy with antibodies, which was used for most kidney, pancreas after kidney (PAK), simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and pancreas transplant alone (PTA) recipients in 2004 (72-81%) and for approximately half of all intestine, heart and lung recipients. The highest usage of the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil combination as discharge regimen was reported for SPK (72%) and PAK (64%) recipients. Maintenance of the original discharge regimen through the first 3 years following transplantation varied significantly by organ and drug. The usage of calcineurin inhibitors for maintenance therapy was characterized by a clear transition from cyclosporine to tacrolimus. Corticosteroids were administered to the majority of patients; however, steroid-avoidance and steroid-withdrawal protocols have become increasingly common. The percentage of patients treated for acute rejection during the first year following transplantation has continued to decline, reaching 13% for those who received a kidney in 2003, 48% of which cases were treated with antibodies.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1131
页数:21
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Predictors of length of stay for pediatric liver transplant recipients [J].
Bucuvalas, JC ;
Zeng, L ;
Anand, R .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (08) :1011-1017
[2]   Steroid-free liver transplantation using rabbit antithymocyte globulin and early tacrolimus monotherapy [J].
Eason, JD ;
Nair, S ;
Cohen, AJ ;
Blazek, JL ;
Loss, GE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (08) :1396-1399
[3]  
Fasola CG, 2005, AM J TRANSPLANT, V5, P276
[4]   Lack of antiviral effect of a short course of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection [J].
Firpi, RJ ;
Nelson, DR ;
Davis, GL .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (01) :57-61
[5]   Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of June 2004 [J].
Gruessner, AC ;
Sutherland, DE .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 19 (04) :433-455
[6]   Calcineurin inhibitor- and steroid-free immunosuppression in pancreas-kidney and solitary pancreas transplantation [J].
Gruessner, RWG ;
Kandaswamy, R ;
Humar, A ;
Gruessner, AC ;
Sutherland, DER .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (09) :1184-1189
[7]  
Gruessner RWG, 2003, TRANSPLANTATION OF THE PANCREAS, P349
[8]   A prospective randomized trial of tacrolimus and prednisone versus tacrolimus, prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil in primary adult liver transplantation: A single center report [J].
Jain, A ;
Kashyap, R ;
Dodson, F ;
Kramer, D ;
Hamad, I ;
Khan, A ;
Eghestad, B ;
Starzl, TE ;
Fung, JJ .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 72 (06) :1091-1097
[9]   Analytical methods and database design: Implications for transplant researchers, 2005 [J].
Levine, GN ;
McCullough, KP ;
Rodgers, AM ;
Dickinson, DM ;
Ashby, VB ;
Schaubel, DE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (05) :1228-1242
[10]   Use of alemtuzumab and tacrolimus monotherapy for cadaveric liver transplantation: With particular reference to hepatitis C virus [J].
Marcos, A ;
Eghtesad, B ;
Fung, JJ ;
Fontes, P ;
Patel, K ;
deVera, M ;
Marsh, W ;
Gayowski, T ;
Demetris, AJ ;
Gray, EA ;
Flynn, B ;
Zeevi, A ;
Murase, N ;
Starzl, TE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (07) :966-971