Neonatal and carrier screening for rare diseases: how innovation challenges screening criteria worldwide

被引:35
作者
Cornel, Martina C. [1 ]
Rigter, Tessel [1 ]
Jansen, Marleen E. [1 ]
Henneman, Lidewij [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reprod & Dev Res Inst, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Clin Genet Sect Community Genet,Amsterdam UMC, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Neonatal screening; Genetic carrier screening; Rare diseases; Carrier state; Expanded screening; Treatment; Technology; Screening criteria; Reproductive autonomy; TAY-SACHS-DISEASE; LESSONS; PROGRAMS; DECISION; PRECONCEPTION; DISORDERS; STATEMENT; GENOMICS; RISK; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s12687-020-00488-y
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Screening for rare diseases first began more than 50 years ago with neonatal bloodspot screening (NBS) for phenylketonuria, and carrier screening for Tay-Sachs disease, sickle cell anaemia and beta-thalassaemia. NBS's primary aim is health gain for children, while carrier screening enables autonomous reproductive choice. While screening can be beneficial, it also has the potential to cause harm and thus decisions are needed on whether a specific screening is worthwhile. These decisions are usually based on screening principles and criteria. Technological developments, both treatment driven and test driven, have led to expansions in neonatal screening and carrier screening. This article demonstrates how the dynamics and expansions in NBS and carrier screening have challenged four well-known screening criteria (treatment, test, target population and programme evaluation), and the decision-making based on them. We show that shifting perspectives on screening criteria for NBS as well as carrier screening lead to converging debates in these separate fields. For example, the child is traditionally considered to be the beneficiary in NBS, but the family and society can also benefit. Vice versa, carrier screening may be driven by disease prevention, rather than reproductive autonomy, raising cross-disciplinary questions regarding potential beneficiaries and which diseases to include. In addition, the stakeholders from these separate fields vary: Globally NBS is often governed as a public health programme while carrier screening is usually available via medical professionals. The article concludes with a call for an exchange of vision and knowledge among all stakeholders of both fields to attune the dynamics of screening.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 265
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [11] Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 2 - From screening laboratory results to treatment, follow-up and quality assurance
    Burgard, Peter
    Rupp, Kathrin
    Lindner, Martin
    Haege, Gisela
    Rigter, Tessel
    Weinreich, Stephanie S.
    Loeber, J. Gerard
    Taruscio, Domenica
    Vittozzi, Luciano
    Cornel, Martina C.
    Hoffmann, Georg F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INHERITED METABOLIC DISEASE, 2012, 35 (04) : 613 - 625
  • [12] How does carrier status for recessive disorders influence reproductive decisions? A systematic review of the literature
    Cannon, Jeffrey
    Van Steijvoort, Eva
    Borry, Pascal
    Chokoshvili, Davit
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2019, 19 (12) : 1117 - 1129
  • [13] Expanded carrier screening for monogenic disorders: where are we now?
    Chokoshvili, Davit
    Vears, Danya
    Borry, Pascal
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2018, 38 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [14] Carrier screening for Beta-thalassaemia: a review of international practice
    Cousens, Nicole E.
    Gaff, Clara L.
    Metcalfe, Sylvia A.
    Delatycki, Martin B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2010, 18 (10) : 1077 - 1083
  • [15] Preconception care and genetic risk: Ethical issues
    De Wert G.M.W.R.
    Dondorp W.J.
    Knoppers B.M.
    [J]. Journal of Community Genetics, 2012, 3 (3) : 221 - 228
  • [16] International perspectives on the implementation of reproductive carrier screening
    Delatycki, Martin B.
    Alkuraya, Fowzan
    Archibald, Alison
    Castellani, Carlo
    Cornel, Martina
    Grody, Wayne W.
    Henneman, Lidewij
    Ioannides, Adonis S.
    Kirk, Edwin
    Laing, Nigel
    Lucassen, Anneke
    Massie, John
    Schuurmans, Juliette
    Thong, Meow-Keong
    van Langen, Irene
    Zlotogora, Joel
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2020, 40 (03) : 301 - 310
  • [17] Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening
    Dondorp, Wybo
    de Wert, Guido
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Bianchi, Diana W.
    Bergmann, Carsten
    Borry, Pascal
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    Fellmann, Florence
    Forzano, Francesca
    Hall, Alison
    Henneman, Lidewij
    Howard, Heidi C.
    Lucassen, Anneke
    Ormond, Kelly
    Peterlin, Borut
    Radojkovic, Dragica
    Rogowski, Wolf
    Soller, Maria
    Tibben, Aad
    Tranebjaerg, Lisbeth
    van El, Carla G.
    Cornel, Martina C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2015, 23 (11) : 1438 - 1450
  • [18] Expanded Carrier Screening in Reproductive Medicine-Points to Consider A Joint Statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
    Edwards, Janice G.
    Feldman, Gerald
    Goldberg, James
    Gregg, Anthony R.
    Norton, Mary E.
    Rose, Nancy C.
    Schneider, Adele
    Stoll, Katie
    Wapner, Ronald
    Watson, Michael S.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 (03) : 653 - 662
  • [19] Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counselling
    Elwyn, G
    Gray, J
    Clarke, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2000, 37 (02) : 135 - 138
  • [20] Severe combined immunodeficiencies and related disorders
    Fischer, Alain
    Notarangelo, Luigi D.
    Neven, Benedicte
    Cavazzana, Marina
    Puck, Jennifer M.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DISEASE PRIMERS, 2015, 1