The low power effect on holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP); A comparison between 20W and 37,5W energy regarding apical enucleation efficacy and patient safety

被引:7
作者
Gazel, E. [1 ]
Kaya, E. [2 ]
Yalcin, S. [2 ]
Tokas, T. [3 ]
Aybal, H. C. [4 ]
Yilmaz, S. [2 ]
Aydogan, T. B. [5 ]
Tunc, L. [6 ]
机构
[1] Acibadem Univ Ankara Hosp, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gulhane Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Gen Hosp Hall IT, Dept Urol & Androl, Hall In Tirol, Austria
[4] Ankara Oncol Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[5] Goksun State Hosp, Dept Urol, Kahramanmaras, Turkey
[6] Gazi Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Ankara, Turkey
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2020年 / 30卷 / 12期
关键词
Holmium laser; HoLEP; BPH; Low-energy; Laser energy; MECHANICAL MORCELLATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2020.05.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction. - The Holmium laser has proven to be an invaluable tool for endoscopic prostate enucleation. The proper energy selection, during the different steps of the procedure, has always been a matter of debate. In this work we compare the effectiveness of the Holmium laser, using two different tow-power energy settings, during enucleation and hemostasis (20W and 37.5W). Methods. - One hundred and sixty patients underwent a HoLEP procedure with a 50 Hz and 2J (100W) setting. During enuleation and hemostasis, two different low-power settings were applied (20W vs. 37.5W). In both groups, only the prostatic tissue in the bladder neck and enucteated tissue far away from the apex, were cut with a setting of 50 Hz and 2J (100W). Results. - The mean enucleation efficiency (0.78 vs. 1.2 g/min-p:001) was significantly higher by utilizing 37.5 W energy (group 2). Additionally, the mean enucleation rate (0.64 vs. 0.88%-P:0.001) and laser efficiency (2.07 vs. 2.12 joule/g-P:0.003) were significantly higher in group 2. The enucleation time was significantly shorter (54 vs. 75.5 mins-P:0.002), while the mean catheter removal time (27 vs. 42 hrs-P:0.008) and Hb decrease (0.5 vs. 0.6 g/dl-P:0.019) were significantly lower in group 2. Conclusions. - HoLEP can be performed efficiently with 100 W-37.5 W settings. Enucleation and hemostasis can be performed successfully with 37.5 W, while the use of 100 W during bladder neck dissection shortens the duration of the procedure. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 638
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   EAU Guidelines on Laser Technologies [J].
Herrmann, Thomas R. W. ;
Liatsikos, Evangelos N. ;
Nagele, Udo ;
Traxer, Olivier ;
Merseburger, Axel S. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (04) :783-795
[12]   Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate-Outcomes Independent of Prostate Size? [J].
Humphreys, Mitchell R. ;
Miller, Nicole L. ;
Handa, Shelly E. ;
Terry, Colin ;
Munch, Larry C. ;
Lingeman, James E. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (06) :2431-2435
[13]   Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation in 155 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia [J].
Hurle, R ;
Vavassori, I ;
Piccinelli, A ;
Manzetti, A ;
Valenti, S ;
Vismara, A .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (03) :449-453
[14]   Comparison of Holmium Laser Prostate Enucleation Outcomes in Patients with or without Preoperative Urinary Retention [J].
Johnsen, Niels V. ;
Kammann, Trisha J. ;
Marien, Tracy ;
Pickens, Ryan B. ;
Miller, Nicole L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04) :1021-1026
[15]   Safety and Effectiveness of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Using a Low-power Laser [J].
Minagawa, Shingo ;
Okada, Shinsuke ;
Morikawa, Hirofumi .
UROLOGY, 2017, 110 :51-55
[16]   Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g:: 24-month follow-up [J].
Naspro, Richard ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Scattoni, Vincenzo ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Colombo, Renzo ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Mazzoccoli, Bruno ;
Rigatti, Patrizio ;
Montorsi, Francesco .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (03) :563-568
[17]   A prospective, randomized trial comparing thulium vapoenucleation with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction: perioperative safety and efficacy [J].
Netsch, Christopher ;
Becker, B. ;
Tiburtius, C. ;
Moritz, C. ;
Becci, A. Venneri ;
Herrmann, T. R. W. ;
Gross, A. J. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (12) :1913-1921
[18]   Efficacy of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients with a Small Prostate (≤ 30 mL) [J].
Park, Sejun ;
Kwon, Taekmin ;
Park, Sungchan ;
Moon, Kyung Hyun .
WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2017, 35 (03) :163-169
[19]   Transurethral enucleation of the prostate with the holmium: YAG laser system. How much power is necessary? [J].
Rassweiler, J. ;
Roder, M. ;
Schulze, M. ;
Muschter, R. .
UROLOGE, 2008, 47 (04) :441-448
[20]   Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate [J].
Shah, Hemendra N. ;
Mahajan, Amol P. ;
Sodha, Hiren S. ;
Hegde, Sunil ;
Mohile, Pradnya D. ;
Bansal, Manish B. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04) :1468-1474