Impact of Transferring a Poor Quality Embryo Along with a Good Quality Embryo on Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF/ICSI Cycles: a Retrospective Study

被引:18
作者
Aldemir, Oya [1 ]
Ozelci, Runa [1 ]
Baser, Emre [2 ]
Kaplanoglu, Iskender [1 ]
Dilbaz, Serdar [1 ]
Dilbaz, Berna [1 ]
Tekin, Ozlem Moraloglu [1 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Womens Hlth Training &, Dept Assisted Reprod Technol, Etlik Caddesi 55, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Bozok Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Med Fac, Yozgat, Turkey
关键词
double embryo transfer; embryo quality; cleavage stage; blastocyst stage; live birth rate; multiple pregnancy; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; CLEAVAGE STAGE; LIVE BIRTH; SINGLE; IMPLANTATION; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1055/a-1213-9164
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background The number and the quality of embryos transferred are important predictors of success in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. In the presence of more than one good quality embryo on the transfer day, double-embryo transfer (DET) can be performed with these embryos, but generally, different quality embryos are present in the available transfer cohort. We aimed to investigate the effect of transferring a poor quality embryo along with a good quality embryo on IVF outcomes. Methods In this study, 2298 fresh IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with two good quality embryos (group A), one good and one poor quality embryo (group B), and single good quality embryo (group C) transfers were examined. All groups were divided into two subgroups according to the transfer day as cleavage or blastocyst stage. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were the primary outcomes. Results In the cleavage stage transfer subgroups, the clinical pregnancy rates were lower in the single-embryo transfer (SET) subgroup compared with DET subgroups, but the difference was not statistically significant compared with DET with mixed quality embryos. The live birth rates were comparable between the three groups. In the blastocyst transfer subgroups, the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in DETwith two good quality embryos than DET with mixed quality embryos and SET groups. Multiple pregnancy rates were higher in both DET groups in terms of transfer day (p = 0.001). Conclusion DET with mixed quality embryos results with lower clinical pregnancy and live birth rates compared with DET with two good quality embryos at the blastocyst stage. At cleavage stage transfer, there is no difference in live birth rates between the two groups.
引用
收藏
页码:844 / 850
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Baczkowski Tomasz, 2004, Reprod Biol, V4, P5
[2]   Live birth rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and obstetric outcomes of elective single and double embryo transfers: Hong Kong experience [J].
Chai, Joyce ;
Yeung, Tracy W. Y. ;
Lee, Vivian C. Y. ;
Li, Raymond H. W. ;
Lau, Estella Y. L. ;
Yeung, William S. B. ;
Ho, P. C. ;
Ng, Ernest H. Y. .
HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (02) :102-106
[3]   Effect of transfer of a poor quality embryo along with a top quality embryo on the outcome during fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles [J].
Dobson, Samuel James Alexander ;
Lao, Maria Teresita ;
Michael, Essarn ;
Varghese, Alex C. ;
Jayaprakasan, Kannamannadiar .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) :655-660
[4]  
El-Danasouri I, 2016, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V20, P394
[5]   Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer [J].
Gardner, DK ;
Lane, M ;
Stevens, J ;
Schlenker, T ;
Schoolcraft, WB .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (06) :1155-1158
[6]   The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Gelbaya, Tarek A. ;
Tsoumpou, Ioanna ;
Nardo, Luciano G. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (03) :936-945
[7]   Live birth and multiple birth rates in US in vitro fertilization treatment using donor oocytes: a comparison of single-embryo transfer and double-embryo transfer [J].
Klenov, V. E. ;
Boulet, S. L. ;
Mejia, R. B. ;
Kissin, D. M. ;
Munch, E. ;
Mancuso, A. ;
Van Voorhis, B. J. .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2018, 35 (09) :1657-1664
[8]   Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013 [J].
Kushnir, Vitaly A. ;
Barad, David H. ;
Albertini, David F. ;
Darmon, Sarah K. ;
Gleicher, Norbert .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 15
[9]   Does a poor-quality embryo have an adverse impact on a good-quality embryo when transferred together? [J].
Li, Jiaheng ;
Du, Mingze ;
Zhang, Zhan ;
Guan, Yichun ;
Wang, Xingling ;
Zhang, Xiao ;
Liu, Jing ;
Pan, Zhouhui ;
Wang, Bijun ;
Liu, Wenxia .
JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2018, 11
[10]  
Macklon Nick S, 2014, Biol Reprod, V91, P98, DOI 10.1095/biolreprod.114.122846