Understanding Landscape Stewardship - Lessons to be Learned from Public Service Economics

被引:7
作者
Penker, Marianne [1 ]
Enengel, Barbara [1 ]
Mann, Carsten
Aznar, Olivier [2 ]
机构
[1] BOKU Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Dept Econ & Social Sci, Vienna, Austria
[2] French Natl Res Inst Sci & Technol Environm & Agr, Clermont Ferrand, France
关键词
Contracting; entrepreneurial strategies; landscape stewardship; public service economics; user-orientation; AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL RELATIONSHIPS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; POLICY; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; GOVERNANCE; BARRIERS; SYSTEMS; GOODS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00363.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
We argue that public service economics provides a new perspective on landscape stewardship by explaining it as human-to-human transfer of partial property rights. These mutually linked exchanges involve rights to use, to access, or to control and allocate land, labour, skills or information. From the perspective of public service economics, we identify the actors involved in landscape stewardship and distinguish entrepreneurial strategies for service provision based on resource orientation, user orientation or competiveness orientation. The difficulties in evaluating the quality of services in general and landscape stewardship in particular result in substantial uncertainty. Three types of contracts that cope differently with this uncertainty can be distinguished: contracts focusing on the technical process, on the intended outcome or on the choice of suppliers based on trust and features of their performance potential. We conclude that a service economics perspective can add to the understanding of landscape stewardship. Due to the fact that public service is already a well-known and broadly acknowledged concept in society, public service economics could possibly provide more rapid progress towards a better co-ordination of supply and demand for landscape qualities than other more novel concepts.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 72
页数:19
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [11] Normative, positive and econometric mathematical programming as tools for incorporation of multifunctionality in agricultural policy modelling
    Buysse, Jeroen
    Van Huylenbroeck, Guido
    Lauwers, Ludwig
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 120 (01) : 70 - 81
  • [12] Commons JR, 1931, AM ECON REV, V21, P648
  • [13] The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Costanza, R
    dArge, R
    deGroot, R
    Farber, S
    Grasso, M
    Hannon, B
    Limburg, K
    Naeem, S
    ONeill, RV
    Paruelo, J
    Raskin, RG
    Sutton, P
    vandenBelt, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) : 253 - 260
  • [14] A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services
    de Groot, RS
    Wilson, MA
    Boumans, RMJ
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 41 (03) : 393 - 408
  • [15] Decker F, 1975, EINFUHRUNG DIENSTLEI, P505
  • [16] Delaunay J.C., 1992, SERVICES EC THOUGHT
  • [17] DELAUNAY JC, 1987, ENJEUX SOC SERVICE
  • [18] Owner or Holder? A Critical Study of Property Rights in Public Services
    Desrieux, Claudine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2009, 165 (02): : 230 - 249
  • [19] The iron cage revisited - Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Reprinted from the American Sociological Association vol 48, pg 147-160, 1983)
    DiMaggio, PJ
    Powell, WW
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, VOL 17, 2000: ECONOMICS MEETS SOCIOLOGY IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2000, 17 : 143 - 166
  • [20] Benefits, efforts and risks of participants in landscape co-management: An analytical framework and results from two case studies in Austria
    Enengel, Barbara
    Penker, Marianne
    Muhar, Andreas
    Williams, Rachael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (04) : 1256 - 1267