Performance Comparison of Chunk and Peer Scheduling Algorithms of Peer-to-Peer Streaming Systems

被引:0
作者
Shah, Syed Saddam Hussain [1 ]
Said, Naina [1 ]
Nayab, Aysha [1 ]
Khan, Waleed [1 ]
Shinwari, Zaryab Ali [1 ]
Jawad, M. [1 ]
Minallah, Nasru [1 ]
机构
[1] UET, DCSE, Peshawar, Pakistan
来源
2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FRONTIERS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (FIT 2018) | 2018年
关键词
Peer to Peer systems; Chunk Scheduler; Peer Scheduler; flexibility; scalability; performance; SSSim;
D O I
10.1109/FIT.2018.00070
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With increasing popularity of Peer to Peer systems for video streaming, it is important that the expectations of the users regarding the quality of such systems are being met. In a P2P system, the media stream is divided into small data units known as chunks. Each peer in a Peer to Peer (P2P) system has to take two important decisions at a given time. First, which chunks are to be shared and second with which peer. This paper compares the performance of different combinations of chunk/peer schedulers in terms of chunk diffusion delay, average chunk distribution delay and max chunk distribution delay. By doing so, the best possible combination of the two schedulers for the given experimental setup is explored. The results obtained under the specified experimental setup show that when chunk scheduling algorithm Deadline Based Chunk Scheduler (DLc) is combined with different peer scheduling algorithms, the best results are obtained by its combination with Chunk Earliest Free Pair Scheduler (CEFp). For a constant peer scheduler CEFp combined with different chunk schedulers, the best results are obtained by combining it with Latest Blind Chunk Scheduler (LBc). Finally, with varying neighborhood size, the best results are obtained by the combination of DLC and Chunk Almost Free Peer Scheduler (CAFp).
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 366
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Adaptive multi-source streaming in heterogeneous peer-to-peer networks [J].
Agarwal, V ;
Rejaie, R .
Multimedia Computing and Networking 2005, 2005, 5680 :13-25
[2]  
Birke R, 2011, IEEE INT CONF PEER, P202, DOI 10.1109/P2P.2011.6038736
[3]  
Bradai A., 2013, ARXIV13105557
[4]  
Cheng Bin, 2009, THESIS, P54
[5]  
Fetoh Hatem, 2015, IJACSA INT J ADV COM, V6
[6]   CollectCast: A peer-to-peer service for media streaming [J].
Hefeeda, M ;
Habib, A ;
Xu, DY ;
Bhargava, B ;
Botev, B .
MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS, 2005, 11 (01) :68-81
[7]  
Kiraly Csaba, 2009, INT MULT SERV ARCH A
[8]  
Kiraly Csaba, 2009, CAMAD
[9]   Is Random Scheduling Sufficient in P2P Video Streaming? [J].
Liang, Chao ;
Guo, Yang ;
Liu, Yong .
28TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, :53-+
[10]  
Meskovic M, 2015, INT CONF SOFTW, P205, DOI 10.1109/SOFTCOM.2015.7314110