Dichotomous strategies? The migration of Whimbrels breeding in the eastern Canadian sub-Arctic

被引:33
作者
Johnson, Andrew S. [1 ]
Perz, Johanna [2 ]
Nol, Erica [2 ]
Senner, Nathan R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Cornell Lab Ornithol, 159 Sapsucker Woods Rd, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[2] Trent Univ, Dept Biol, Peterborough, ON K9J 7B8, Canada
[3] Univ Montana, Div Biol Sci, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT 59802 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
capital breeding; geolocation; migration; phenology; shorebird conservation; SEMIPALMATED SANDPIPERS; SHOREBIRDS; MOVEMENTS; BIRDS; CONNECTIVITY; PATTERNS; DECLINES; RELIANCE; SOUTHERN; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1111/jofo.12173
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The conservation of migratory birds requires internationally coordinated efforts that, in turn, demand an understanding of population dynamics and connectivity throughout a species' range. Whimbrels (Numenius phaeopus) are a widespread long-distance migratory shorebird with two disparate North American breeding populations. Monitoring efforts suggest that at least one of these populations is declining, but the level of migratory connectivity linking the two populations to specific non-breeding sites or identifiable conservation threats remains unclear. We deployed light-level geolocators in 2012 to track the migration of Whimbrels breeding near Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. In 2013, we recovered 11 of these geolocators, yielding complete migration tracks for nine individuals. During southbound migration, six of the nine Whimbrels stopped at two staging sites on the mid-Atlantic seaboard of the United States for an average of 22 days, whereas three individuals made nonstop flights of similar to 8000 km from Churchill to South America. All individuals subsequently spent the entire non-breeding season along the northern coasts of Brazil and Suriname. On their way north, all birds stopped at the same two staging sites used during southbound migration. Individuals staged at these sites for an average of 34 days, significantly longer than during southbound migration, and all departed within a 5-day period to undertake nonstop flights ranging from 2600 to 3100 km to the breeding grounds. These extended spring stopovers suggest that female Whimbrels likely employ a mixed breeding strategy, drawing on both endogenous and exogenous reserves to produce their eggs. Our results also demonstrate that this breeding population exhibits a high degree of connectivity among breeding, staging, and wintering sites. As with other long-distance migratory shorebirds, conservation efforts for this population of Whimbrels must therefore focus on a small, but widely spaced, suite of sites that support a large proportion of the population.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 383
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Alerstam T, 2006, ARDEA, V94, P347
[2]  
ANDRES B. A., 2011, 4 W HEM SHOR GROUP M
[3]  
Andres Brad A., 2012, Wader Study Group Bulletin, V119, P178
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CONS PLAN WHIMBR NUM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, LANG ENV STAT COMP
[6]   Valuing Ecosystem Services for Coastal Wetland Protection and Restoration: Progress and Challenges [J].
Barbier, Edward B. .
RESOURCES-BASEL, 2013, 2 (03) :213-230
[7]  
Bates D., 2014, LINEAR MIXED EFFECT
[8]   Empirical evidence for differential organ reductions during trans-oceanic bird flight [J].
Battley, PF ;
Piersma, T ;
Dietz, MW ;
Tang, SX ;
Dekinga, A ;
Hulsman, K .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 267 (1439) :191-195
[9]   Contrasting extreme long-distance migration patterns in bar-tailed godwits Limosa lapponica [J].
Battley, Phil F. ;
Warnock, Nils ;
Tibbitts, T. Lee ;
Gill, Robert E., Jr. ;
Piersma, Theunis ;
Hassell, Chris J. ;
Douglas, David C. ;
Mulcahy, Daniel M. ;
Gartrell, Brett D. ;
Schuckard, Rob ;
Melville, David S. ;
Riegen, Adrian C. .
JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY, 2012, 43 (01) :21-32
[10]   Advances in tracking small migratory birds: a technical review of light-level geolocation [J].
Bridge, Eli S. ;
Kelly, Jeffrey F. ;
Contina, Andrea ;
Gabrielson, Richard M. ;
MacCurdy, Robert B. ;
Winkler, David W. .
JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 2013, 84 (02) :121-137