Pleiotropic effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin vs. high dose simvastatin

被引:43
作者
Pesaro, Antonio Eduardo P. [1 ]
Serrano, Carlos V., Jr. [1 ]
Fernandes, Juliano L. [1 ]
Cavalcanti, Alexandre B. [2 ]
Campos, Alexandre H. [3 ]
Martins, Herlon S. [4 ]
Maranhao, Raul C. [1 ]
de Lemos, James A. [5 ]
Souza, Heraldo P. [4 ]
Nicolau, Jose C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Heart, BR-05403901 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Hosp Coracao HCor, Res Inst, HCor Cardiac Hosp Hosp Coracao, BR-04005000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Albert Einstein Hosp, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Clin Hosp, BR-05403000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Coronary artery disease; Cholesterol; Inflammation; Platelet function; Statins; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; PLATELET-FUNCTION; STATIN THERAPY; CHOLESTEROL; ATORVASTATIN; EZETIMIBE; MEMBRANE; ASPIRIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.01.062
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In the setting of stable coronary artery disease (CAD), it is not known if the pleiotropic effects of cholesterol reduction differ between combined ezetimibe/simvastatin and high-dose simvastatin alone. Objective: We sought to compare the anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet effects of ezetimibe 10 mg/simvastatin 20 mg (E10/S20) with simvastatin 80 mg (S80). Methods and results: CAD patients (n = 83, 63 +/- 9 years, 57% men) receiving S20, were randomly allocated to receive E10/S20 or S80, for 6 weeks. Lipids, inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, soluble CD40 ligand and oxidized LDL), and platelet aggregation (platelet function analyzer [PFA]-100) changes were determined. Baseline lipids, inflammatory markers and PFA-100 were similar between groups. After treatment, E10/S20 and S80 patients presented, respectively: (1) similar reduction in LDL-C (29 +/- 13% vs. 28 +/- 30%, p = 0.46), apo-B (18 +/- 17% vs. 22 +/- 15%, p = 0.22) and oxidized LDL (15 +/- 33% vs. 18 +/- 47%, p = 0.30); (2) no changes in inflammatory markers; and, (3) a higher increase of the PFA-100 with E10/S20 than with S80 (27 +/- 43% vs. 8 +/- 33%, p = 0.02). Conclusions: These data suggest that among stable CAD patients treated with S20, (1) both E10/S20 and S80 were equally effective in further reducing LDL-C; (2) neither treatment had any further significant anti-inflammatory effects; and (3) E10/S20 was more effective than S80 in inhibiting platelet aggregation. Thus, despite similar lipid lowering and doses 4x less of simvastatin, E10/S20 induced a greater platelet inhibitory effect than S80. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 404
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Atorvastatin reduces proinflammatory markers in hypercholesterolemic patients
    Ascer, E
    Bertolami, MC
    Venturinelli, ML
    Buccheri, V
    Souza, J
    Nicolau, JC
    Ramires, JAF
    Serrano, CV
    [J]. ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2004, 177 (01) : 161 - 166
  • [2] Effect of Ezetimibe/Atorvastatin Combination on Oxidized Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease or Coronary Artery Disease Equivalent
    Azar, Rabih R.
    Badaoui, Georges
    Sarkis, Antoine
    Azar, Mireille
    Aydanian, Hermine
    Harb, Serge
    Achkouty, Guy
    Kassab, Roland
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 106 (02) : 193 - 197
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins
    Baigent, C
    Keech, A
    Kearney, PM
    Blackwell, L
    Buck, G
    Pollicino, C
    Kirby, A
    Sourjina, T
    Peto, R
    Collins, R
    Simes, J
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 366 (9493) : 1267 - 1278
  • [4] Elevated ICAM-1 and MCP-1 plasma levels in subjects at high cardiovascular risk are diminished by atorvastatin treatment.: Atorvastatin on inflammatory markers study:: A substudy of achieve cholesterol targets fast with atorvastatin stratified titration
    Blanco-Colio, Luis Miguel
    Martin-Ventura, Jose Luis
    de Teresa, Eduardo
    Farsang, Csaba
    Gaw, Allan
    Gensini, GianFranco
    Leiter, Lawrence A.
    Langer, Anatoly
    Martineau, Pierre
    Egido, Jesus
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 153 (05) : 881 - 888
  • [5] Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes
    Cannon, CP
    Braunwald, E
    McCabe, CH
    Rader, DJ
    Rouleau, JL
    Belder, R
    Joyal, SV
    Hill, KA
    Pfeffer, MA
    Skene, AM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (15) : 1495 - 1504
  • [6] Effect of atorvastatin and irbesartan, alone and in combination, on postprandial endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammation in type 2 diabetic patients
    Ceriello, A
    Assaloni, R
    Da Ros, R
    Maier, A
    Piconi, L
    Quagliaro, L
    Esposito, K
    Giugliano, D
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2005, 111 (19) : 2518 - 2524
  • [7] Collins R, 2002, LANCET, V360, P7, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3
  • [8] Serial measurement of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 after acute coronary syndromes
    de Lemos, James A.
    Morrow, David A.
    Blazing, Michael A.
    Jarolim, Petr
    Wiviott, Stephen D.
    Sabatine, Marc S.
    Califf, Robert M.
    Braunwald, Eugene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 50 (22) : 2117 - 2124
  • [9] Fenton J. W. II, 2005, Current Drug Targets - Cardiovascular & Haematological Disorders, V5, P115, DOI 10.2174/1568006043586189
  • [10] Effect of Statins Alone Versus Statins Plus Ezetimibe on Carotid Atherosclerosis in Type 2 Diabetes
    Fleg, Jerome L.
    Mete, Mihriye
    Howard, Barabara V.
    Umans, Jason G.
    Roman, Mary J.
    Ratner, Robert E.
    Silverman, Angela
    Galloway, James M.
    Henderson, Jeffrey A.
    Weir, Matthew R.
    Wilson, Charlton
    Stylianou, Mario
    Howard, Wm. James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 52 (25) : 2198 - 2205