A machine learning-based framework for delivery error prediction in proton pencil beam scanning using irradiation log-files

被引:10
|
作者
Maes, Dominic [1 ,3 ]
Bowen, Stephen R. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Regmi, Rajesh [1 ]
Bloch, Charles [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Tony [1 ,2 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly [3 ]
Saini, Jatinder [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Canc Care Alliance Proton Therapy Ctr, 1570 N 115th St, Seattle, WA 98133 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2020年 / 78卷
关键词
Proton therapy; Pencil beam scanning; Machine learning; Neural networks; Log-files; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; ALGORITHM; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.09.008
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the use of machine learning models for delivery error prediction in proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) delivery. Methods: A dataset of planned and delivered PBS spot parameters was generated from a set of 20 prostate patient treatments. Planned spot parameters (spot position, MU and energy) were extracted from the treatment planning system (TPS) for each beam. Delivered spot parameters were extracted from irradiation log-files for each beam delivery following treatment. The dataset was used as a training dataset for three machine learning models which were trained to predict delivered spot parameters based on planned parameters. K-fold cross validation was employed for hyper-parameter tuning and model selection where the mean absolute error (MAE) was used as the model evaluation metric. The model with lowest MAE was then selected to generate a predicted dose distribution for a test prostate patient within a commercial TPS. Results: Analysis of the spot position delivery error between planned and delivered values resulted in standard deviations of 0.39 mm and 0.44 mm for x and y spot positions respectively. Prediction error standard deviation values of spot positions using the selected model were 0.22 mm and 0.11 mm for x and y spot positions respectively. Finally, a three-way comparison of dose distributions and DVH values for select OARs indicates that the random-forest-predicted dose distribution within the test prostate patient was in closer agreement to the delivered dose distribution than the planned distribution. Conclusions: PBS delivery error can be accurately predicted using machine learning techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 186
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using emergency department triage for machine learning-based admission and mortality prediction
    Tschoellitsch, Thomas
    Seidl, Philipp
    Bock, Carl
    Maletzky, Alexander
    Moser, Philipp
    Thumfart, Stefan
    Giretzlehner, Michael
    Hochreiter, Sepp
    Meier, Jens
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 30 (06) : 408 - 416
  • [42] Machine learning-based colorectal cancer prediction using global dietary data
    Hanif Abdul Rahman
    Mohammad Ashraf Ottom
    Ivo D. Dinov
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [43] Machine learning-based colorectal cancer prediction using global dietary data
    Abdul Rahman, Hanif
    Ottom, Mohammad Ashraf
    Dinov, Ivo D.
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [44] Vmin Shift Prediction Using Machine Learning-Based Methodology for Automotive Products
    Yang, Y. L.
    Tsao, P. C.
    Lin, C. W.
    Chen, H. Q.
    Huang, B. J.
    Hsieh, Hank
    Chen, Kerwin
    Lee, Ross
    Koh, Khim
    Ting, Y. J.
    Hsu, B. C.
    Huang, Y. S.
    Lai, Citi
    Lee, M. Z.
    Lee, T. H.
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL RELIABILITY PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM, IRPS 2024, 2024,
  • [45] Machine learning-based prediction of diabetic patients using blood routine data
    Li, Honghao
    Su, Dongqing
    Zhang, Xinpeng
    He, Yuanyuan
    Luo, Xu
    Xiong, Yuqiang
    Zou, Min
    Wei, Huiyan
    Wen, Shaoran
    Xi, Qilemuge
    Zuo, Yongchun
    Yang, Lei
    METHODS, 2024, 229 : 156 - 162
  • [46] Machine Learning-Based Bayesian Framework for Interval Estimate of Unsafe-Event Prediction in Construction
    Wu, Lingzi
    Mohamed, Emad
    Jafari, Parinaz
    AbouRizk, Simaan
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 149 (11)
  • [47] Machine Learning-based Fundamental Stock Prediction Using Companies' Financial Reports
    Abdi, Kamran
    Rezaei, Hossein
    Hooshmand, Mohsen
    2024 32ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, ICEE 2024, 2024, : 581 - 585
  • [48] Machine Learning-Based Cellular Traffic Prediction Using Data Reduction Techniques
    Nashaat, Heba
    Mohammed, Nihal H.
    Abdel-Mageid, Salah M.
    Rizk, Rawya Y.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 58927 - 58939
  • [49] A Machine Learning-Based Tire Life Prediction Framework for Increasing Life of Commercial Vehicle Tires
    Karkaria, Vispi
    Chen, Jie
    Siuta, Chase
    Lim, Damien
    Radulescu, Robert
    Chen, Wei
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2024, 146 (02)
  • [50] Machine learning-based defect prediction model using multilayer perceptron algorithm for escalating the reliability of the software
    Juneja, Sapna
    Nauman, Ali
    Uppal, Mudita
    Gupta, Deepali
    Alroobaea, Roobaea
    Muminov, Bahodir
    Tao, Yuning
    JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2024, 80 (07) : 10122 - 10147