A machine learning-based framework for delivery error prediction in proton pencil beam scanning using irradiation log-files

被引:10
|
作者
Maes, Dominic [1 ,3 ]
Bowen, Stephen R. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Regmi, Rajesh [1 ]
Bloch, Charles [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Tony [1 ,2 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly [3 ]
Saini, Jatinder [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Canc Care Alliance Proton Therapy Ctr, 1570 N 115th St, Seattle, WA 98133 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2020年 / 78卷
关键词
Proton therapy; Pencil beam scanning; Machine learning; Neural networks; Log-files; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; ALGORITHM; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.09.008
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the use of machine learning models for delivery error prediction in proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) delivery. Methods: A dataset of planned and delivered PBS spot parameters was generated from a set of 20 prostate patient treatments. Planned spot parameters (spot position, MU and energy) were extracted from the treatment planning system (TPS) for each beam. Delivered spot parameters were extracted from irradiation log-files for each beam delivery following treatment. The dataset was used as a training dataset for three machine learning models which were trained to predict delivered spot parameters based on planned parameters. K-fold cross validation was employed for hyper-parameter tuning and model selection where the mean absolute error (MAE) was used as the model evaluation metric. The model with lowest MAE was then selected to generate a predicted dose distribution for a test prostate patient within a commercial TPS. Results: Analysis of the spot position delivery error between planned and delivered values resulted in standard deviations of 0.39 mm and 0.44 mm for x and y spot positions respectively. Prediction error standard deviation values of spot positions using the selected model were 0.22 mm and 0.11 mm for x and y spot positions respectively. Finally, a three-way comparison of dose distributions and DVH values for select OARs indicates that the random-forest-predicted dose distribution within the test prostate patient was in closer agreement to the delivered dose distribution than the planned distribution. Conclusions: PBS delivery error can be accurately predicted using machine learning techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 186
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning
    Newpower, Mark A.
    Chiang, Bing-Hao
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    Chen, Yong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (05):
  • [22] Evidential reasoning and machine learning-based framework for assessment and prediction of human error factors-induced fire incidents
    Ouache, R.
    Bakhtavar, E.
    Hu, G.
    Hewage, K.
    Sadiq, R.
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 49
  • [23] Machine learning-based error compensation for high precision laser arbitrary beam splitting
    Lin, Dongfeng
    Li, Danyang
    Cui, Yiping
    Zhang, Tao
    Meng, Fanchao
    Zhao, Xiaoting
    Ding, Jinmin
    Liang, Sheng
    OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 160
  • [24] Investigation of the impact of machine operating parameters on beam delivery time and its correlation with treatment plan characteristics for synchrotron-based proton pencil beam spot scanning system
    Liang, Xiaoying
    Beltran, Chris
    Liu, Chunbo
    Shen, Jiajian
    Bues, Martin
    Furutani, Keith M. M.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [25] Continuous Defect Prediction in CI/CD Pipelines: A Machine Learning-Based Framework
    Giorgio, Lazzarinetti
    Nicola, Massarenti
    Fabio, Sgro
    Andrea, Salafia
    AIXIA 2021 - ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 13196 : 591 - 606
  • [26] A machine learning-based framework for online prediction of battery ageing trajectory and lifetime using histogram data
    Zhang, Yizhou
    Wik, Torsten
    Bergstrom, John
    Pecht, Michael
    Zou, Changfu
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2022, 526
  • [27] Identifying localized amenities for gentrification using a machine learning-based framework
    Zeng, Jin
    Yue, Yang
    Gao, Qili
    Gu, Yanyan
    Ma, Chenglin
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 145
  • [28] A machine learning-based process operability framework using Gaussian processes
    Alves, Victor
    Gazzaneo, Vitor
    Lima, Fernando, V
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 163
  • [29] Prediction of portal dosimetry quality assurance results using log files-derived errors and machine learning techniques
    Lew, Kah Seng
    Chua, Clifford Ghee Ann
    Koh, Calvin Wei Yang
    Lee, James Cheow Lei
    Park, Sung Yong
    Tan, Hong Qi
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 12
  • [30] Prediction of machine learning-based hardness for the polycarbonate using additive manufacturing
    Mahmoud, Haitham A.
    Shanmugasundar, G.
    Vyavahare, Swapnil
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Cep, Robert
    Salunkhe, Sachin
    Gawade, Sharad
    Nasr, Emad S. Abouel
    FRONTIERS IN MATERIALS, 2024, 11