A machine learning-based framework for delivery error prediction in proton pencil beam scanning using irradiation log-files

被引:10
|
作者
Maes, Dominic [1 ,3 ]
Bowen, Stephen R. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Regmi, Rajesh [1 ]
Bloch, Charles [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Tony [1 ,2 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly [3 ]
Saini, Jatinder [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Canc Care Alliance Proton Therapy Ctr, 1570 N 115th St, Seattle, WA 98133 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2020年 / 78卷
关键词
Proton therapy; Pencil beam scanning; Machine learning; Neural networks; Log-files; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; ALGORITHM; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.09.008
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the use of machine learning models for delivery error prediction in proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) delivery. Methods: A dataset of planned and delivered PBS spot parameters was generated from a set of 20 prostate patient treatments. Planned spot parameters (spot position, MU and energy) were extracted from the treatment planning system (TPS) for each beam. Delivered spot parameters were extracted from irradiation log-files for each beam delivery following treatment. The dataset was used as a training dataset for three machine learning models which were trained to predict delivered spot parameters based on planned parameters. K-fold cross validation was employed for hyper-parameter tuning and model selection where the mean absolute error (MAE) was used as the model evaluation metric. The model with lowest MAE was then selected to generate a predicted dose distribution for a test prostate patient within a commercial TPS. Results: Analysis of the spot position delivery error between planned and delivered values resulted in standard deviations of 0.39 mm and 0.44 mm for x and y spot positions respectively. Prediction error standard deviation values of spot positions using the selected model were 0.22 mm and 0.11 mm for x and y spot positions respectively. Finally, a three-way comparison of dose distributions and DVH values for select OARs indicates that the random-forest-predicted dose distribution within the test prostate patient was in closer agreement to the delivered dose distribution than the planned distribution. Conclusions: PBS delivery error can be accurately predicted using machine learning techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 186
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of machine log-files uncertainties on the quality assurance of proton pencil beam scanning treatment delivery
    Toscano, S.
    Souris, K.
    Goma, C.
    Barragan-Montero, A.
    Puydupin, S.
    Vander Stappen, F.
    Janssens, G.
    Matic, A.
    Geets, X.
    Sterpin, E.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (09)
  • [2] Assessment of pencil beam scanning proton therapy beam delivery accuracy through machine learning and log file analysis
    Ranjith, C. P.
    Krishnan, Mayakannan
    Raveendran, Vysakh
    Chaudhari, Lalit
    Laskar, Siddhartha
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 127
  • [3] Log file based Monte Carlo calculations for proton pencil beam scanning therapy
    Winterhalter, Carla
    Meier, Gabriel
    Oxley, David
    Weber, Damien C.
    Lomax, Antony J.
    Safai, Sairos
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (03)
  • [4] Prediction of VMAT delivery accuracy using plan modulation complexity score and log-files analysis
    Viola, Pietro
    Romano, Carmela
    Craus, Maurizio
    Macchia, Gabriella
    Buwenge, Milly
    Indovina, Luca
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Morganti, Alessio G.
    Deodato, Francesco
    Cilla, Savino
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2022, 8 (05):
  • [5] Toward automatic beam angle selection for pencil-beam scanning proton liver treatments: A deep learning-based approach
    Kaderka, Robert
    Liu, Keng-Chi
    Liu, Lawrence
    VanderStraeten, Reynald
    Liu, Tyng-Luh
    Lee, Kuang-Min
    Tu, Yi-Chin Ethan
    MacEwan, Iain
    Simpson, Daniel
    Urbanic, James
    Chang, Chang
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (07) : 4293 - 4304
  • [6] Clinical Implementation of Proton Therapy Using Pencil-Beam Scanning Delivery Combined With Static Apertures
    Baeumer, Christian
    Plaude, Sandija
    Khalil, Dalia Ahmad
    Geismar, Dirk
    Kramer, Paul-Heinz
    Kroninger, Kevin
    Nitsch, Christian
    Wulff, Joerg
    Timmermann, Beate
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [7] Learning-Based Anomaly Detection Using Log Files with Sequential Relationships
    Falt, Markus
    Forsstrom, Stefan
    He, Qing
    Zhang, Tingting
    2022 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND SAFETY, ICSRS, 2022, : 337 - 342
  • [8] Automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose-mimicking optimization
    Maes, Dominic
    Holmstrom, Mats
    Helander, Rasmus
    Saini, Jatinder
    Fang, Christine
    Bowen, Stephen R.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (10):
  • [9] Investigation of beam delivery time for synchrotron-based proton pencil beam scanning system with novel scanning mode
    Liang, Xiaoying
    Liu, Chunbo
    Furutani, Keith M.
    Shen, Jiajian
    Bues, Martin
    Dougherty, Jingjing M.
    Li, Heng
    Parisi, Alessio
    Shrestha, Deepak K.
    Yaddanpudi, Sridhar
    Beltran, Chris
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (17)
  • [10] Technical note: Delivery benefit and dosimetric implication of synchrotron-based proton pencil beam scanning using continuous scanning mode
    Liang, Xiaoying
    Beltran, Chris J.
    Liu, Chunbo
    Shen, Jiajian
    Li, Heng
    Furutani, Keith M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (08) : 5252 - 5261