Performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: From regulation to calculation for 40 CFR 191.13

被引:21
|
作者
Helton, JC [1 ]
Anderson, DR [1 ]
Marietta, MG [1 ]
Rechard, RP [1 ]
机构
[1] SANDIA NATL LABS,ALBUQUERQUE,NM 87185
关键词
D O I
10.1287/opre.45.2.157
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is being developed by the U.S. Department of Energy as a disposal facility for transuranic waste and must comply with several environmental regulations, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's standard for geologic disposal of radioactive waste (40 CFR 191). Procedures used in recent performance assessments for the WIPP to translate regulations into a structure that facilitates quantitative analysis we described. Topics considered include (I) development of a clear conceptual representation for problems that are initially ill-defined, (2) conversion of qualitative guidance into numerical calculations, (3) explicit incorporation of different types of uncertainty (i.e., aleatory and epistemic) into analysis outcomes, (4) requirements for efficient computation and models at different levels of complexity, (5) use of sensitivity analysis to guide additional data collection and future calculations, (6) requirements for results to be presented and explained to audiences with different interests and levels of sophistication, and (7) ambiguity with respect to final uses of the analysis and its outcomes. The need to address similar concepts and problems arises in many analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 177
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An early review of the performance assessment in the draft compliance certification application for the waste isolation pilot plant
    Lee, WWL
    SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT XIX, 1996, 412 : 913 - 919
  • [22] Comments on "Performance assessment in support of the 1996 compliance certification application for the waste isolation pilot plant"
    Budnitz, RJ
    RISK ANALYSIS, 1999, 19 (05) : 989 - 990
  • [23] Review and perspectives on spallings release models in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
    Knowles, MK
    Hansen, FD
    Thompson, TW
    Schatz, JF
    Gross, M
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2000, 69 (1-3) : 331 - 341
  • [24] Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained in the 1992 performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant
    Helton, JC
    Anderson, DR
    Baker, BL
    Bean, JE
    Berglund, JW
    Beyeler, W
    Economy, K
    Garner, JW
    Hora, SC
    Iuzzolino, HJ
    Knupp, P
    Marietta, MG
    Rath, J
    Rechard, RP
    Roache, PJ
    Rudeen, DK
    Salari, K
    Schreiber, JD
    Swift, PN
    Tierney, MS
    Vaughn, P
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1996, 51 (01) : 53 - 100
  • [25] An overview of EPA regulation of the safe disposal of transuranic waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
    Wolbarst, AB
    Forinash, EK
    Byrum, CO
    Peake, RT
    Marcinowski, F
    Kruger, MU
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2001, 80 (02): : 110 - 125
  • [26] Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Performance Assessment: Radionuclide Release Sensitivity to Diminished Brine and Gas Flows to/from Transuranic Waste Disposal Areas
    Day, Brad A.
    Camphouse, R. C.
    Zeitler, Todd R.
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 49 (02) : 450 - 457
  • [27] Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)
    Chaturvedi, L
    GEOTIMES, 1999, 44 (04): : 4 - 4
  • [28] THE WASTE ISOLATION PILOT-PLANT
    HULBERT, DI
    JOHNSON, JE
    MAIRSON, RC
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1980, 34 (JUN): : 372 - 373
  • [29] UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS RESULTS OBTAINED IN A PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FOR THE WASTE ISOLATION PILOT-PLANT
    HELTON, JC
    GARNER, JW
    MARIETTA, MG
    RECHARD, RP
    RUDEEN, DK
    SWIFT, PN
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1993, 114 (04) : 286 - 331
  • [30] Stochastic and subjective uncertainty in the assessment of radiation exposure at the waste isolation pilot plant
    Helton, JC
    Johnson, JD
    Jow, HN
    McCurley, RD
    Rahal, LJ
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1998, 4 (02): : 469 - 526