COMPARISON OF DIRECT DNA STRAND BREAK SIMULATED WITH DIFFERENT DNA MODELS

被引:10
作者
Xie, Wenzhang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Junli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Chunyan [4 ]
Qiu, Rui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yan, Congchong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zeng, Zhi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Engn Phys, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Particle & Radiat Imaging, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Key Lab High Energy Radiat Imaging Fundamental Sc, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Nuctech Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LIQUID WATER; CROSS-SECTIONS; DAMAGE; ELECTRONS; DISTRIBUTIONS; PHOTONS; TARGETS; CELL;
D O I
10.1093/rpd/nct074
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage, the geometric model of DNA is of great importance. To study the influence of DNA model on the simulation of DNA damage, three DNA models were utilised in this paper. They were a volume model and two atomic models with different parameters. A direct DNA strand break induced by low-energy electrons was simulated, respectively, with the three models. The results show that most of the energy depositions in the DNA segments do not lead to strand breaks. The simple single-strand break (SSB) tends to be the predominant damage type, and the contribution of complex double-strand break (DSB) to the total DSB cannot be neglected. Among the yields of all the three DNA target models applied here, the yields of the volume model are the highest, the yields of the atomic model with double van der Waals radii (r) take the second place, whereas the yields of the atomic model with single r come last. On average, the ratios of SSB yields are approximately equivalent to the corresponding ratios of the models' volume. However, there seems to be no clear relationship between the DSB yields and the models' volume.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 288
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   Modeling of ultrasoft X-ray induced DNA damage using structured higher order DNA targets [J].
Bernhardt, P ;
Friedland, W ;
Jacob, P ;
Paretzke, HG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2003, 223 (1-3) :579-597
[3]   Calculation of electron impact ionization cross sections of DNA using the Deutsch-Mark and Binary-Encounter-Bethe formalisms [J].
Bernhardt, P ;
Paretzke, HG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2003, 223 (1-3) :599-611
[4]  
Boudaïffa B, 2000, SCIENCE, V287, P1658, DOI 10.1126/science.287.5458.1658
[5]  
Chandrasekaran R., 1989, LANDOLT BORNSTEIN NU
[6]   CALCULATION OF INITIAL YIELDS OF SINGLE-STRAND AND DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS IN CELL-NUCLEI FROM ELECTRONS, PROTONS AND ALPHA-PARTICLES [J].
CHARLTON, DE ;
NIKJOO, H ;
HUMM, JL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1989, 56 (01) :1-19
[7]   A METHOD OF CALCULATING INITIAL DNA STRAND BREAKAGE FOLLOWING THE DECAY OF INCORPORATED I125 [J].
CHARLTON, DE ;
HUMM, JL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1988, 53 (03) :353-365
[8]   Geant4 physics processes for microdosimetry simulation: Design foundation and implementation of the first set of models [J].
Chauvie, S. ;
Francis, Z. ;
Guatelli, S. ;
Incerti, S. ;
Mascialino, B. ;
Moretto, P. ;
Nieminen, P. ;
Pia, M. G. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2007, 54 (06) :2619-2628
[9]   Electron inelastic-scattering cross sections in liquid water [J].
Dingfelder, M ;
Hantke, D ;
Inokuti, M ;
Paretzke, HG .
RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 1998, 53 (01) :1-18
[10]   Molecular scale track structure simulations in liquid water using the Geant4-DNA Monte-Carlo processes [J].
Francis, Z. ;
Incerti, S. ;
Capra, R. ;
Mascialino, B. ;
Montarou, G. ;
Stepan, V. ;
Villagrasa, C. .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2011, 69 (01) :220-226