Indicators for self-organization potential in urban context

被引:16
|
作者
Partanen, Jenni [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Technol, Sch Architecture Urban Planning & Design, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
关键词
self-organization; complexity; urban evolution; innovation; planning; CELLULAR-AUTOMATA MODEL; DYNAMIC-MODEL; METHODOLOGY; COMPLEXITY; EMERGENCE; SYSTEMS; CHAOS;
D O I
10.1068/b140064p
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Self-organization is a basic mechanism by which complex urban systems organize themselves. This mechanism emerges from individual agents' local interactions, often with unpredictable consequences at the regional level. These emergent patterns cannot be controlled by traditional hierarchical methods, but they can be steered and encouraged towards desirable goals. Self-organization is often used as an allegory for all unplanned' activity in cities. It is important to study the actual mechanisms of self-organization in cities to link the theory of self-organization to planning praxis. This work builds on ongoing work exploring novel complex planning tools and methods. Here I explore the key features of open dynamic systems identified in the literature as indicators of self-organizing capacity. I study their applicability in urban spatial planning, and propose three measurable characteristics for estimating the self-organization potential of urban activities. Flow reflects generic accessibility, and is measured using space syntax. Internal order refers to autonomously organizing entities, in this case the clustering tendencies of activities. Enriching rests upon increasing complexity and is measured as changes in degrees of entropy over time. The results indicate that (1) the study area meets the criteria for self-organization, and (2) these characteristics can be applied to discover nodes of higher potential for self-organization in a city.
引用
收藏
页码:951 / 971
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On the logical relationship between natural selection and self-organization
    Hoelzer, G. A.
    Smith, E.
    Pepper, J. W.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2006, 19 (06) : 1785 - 1794
  • [42] Guiding the Self-Organization of Cyber-Physical Systems
    Gershenson, Carlos
    FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2020, 7
  • [43] Exploration of the self-organization theory eff ect on urban development
    Wei Zeng
    Xiao Ma
    Jiangqiao Liu
    西部人居环境学刊 , 2015, (S1) : 44 - 49
  • [44] Urban Land Changes as the Interaction Between Self-Organization and Institutions
    Zhang, Shuhai
    De Roo, Gert
    Van Dijk, Terry
    PLANNING PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2015, 30 (02) : 160 - 178
  • [45] Ecotourism's ethics: Self-organization and care in urban Guyana
    Vaughn, Sarah Elizabeth
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING E-NATURE AND SPACE, 2022, 5 (02) : 976 - 994
  • [46] Ontological diversity in urban self-organization: Complexity, critical realism and post-structuralism
    Boonstra, Beitske
    Rauws, Ward
    PLANNING THEORY, 2021, 20 (04) : 303 - 324
  • [47] The role of leadership in emergent, self-organization
    Plowman, Donde Ashmos
    Solansk, Stephanie
    Beck, Tammy E.
    Baker, LaKami
    Kulkarni, Mukta
    Travis, Deandra Villarreal
    LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2007, 18 (04) : 341 - 356
  • [48] Facilitating Planning by using Self-organization
    Kosak, Oliver
    Reif, Wolfgang
    2017 IEEE 2ND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOPS ON FOUNDATIONS AND APPLICATIONS OF SELF* SYSTEMS (FAS*W), 2017, : 371 - 374
  • [49] Dynamics and self-organization of catalytic systems
    Ertl, G.
    TOPICS IN CATALYSIS, 1994, 1 (3-4) : 305 - 314
  • [50] Self-organization Versus Self-management Two Sides of the Same Coin?
    Clancy, Thomas R.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 39 (03): : 106 - 109