Indicators for self-organization potential in urban context

被引:16
|
作者
Partanen, Jenni [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Technol, Sch Architecture Urban Planning & Design, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
关键词
self-organization; complexity; urban evolution; innovation; planning; CELLULAR-AUTOMATA MODEL; DYNAMIC-MODEL; METHODOLOGY; COMPLEXITY; EMERGENCE; SYSTEMS; CHAOS;
D O I
10.1068/b140064p
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Self-organization is a basic mechanism by which complex urban systems organize themselves. This mechanism emerges from individual agents' local interactions, often with unpredictable consequences at the regional level. These emergent patterns cannot be controlled by traditional hierarchical methods, but they can be steered and encouraged towards desirable goals. Self-organization is often used as an allegory for all unplanned' activity in cities. It is important to study the actual mechanisms of self-organization in cities to link the theory of self-organization to planning praxis. This work builds on ongoing work exploring novel complex planning tools and methods. Here I explore the key features of open dynamic systems identified in the literature as indicators of self-organizing capacity. I study their applicability in urban spatial planning, and propose three measurable characteristics for estimating the self-organization potential of urban activities. Flow reflects generic accessibility, and is measured using space syntax. Internal order refers to autonomously organizing entities, in this case the clustering tendencies of activities. Enriching rests upon increasing complexity and is measured as changes in degrees of entropy over time. The results indicate that (1) the study area meets the criteria for self-organization, and (2) these characteristics can be applied to discover nodes of higher potential for self-organization in a city.
引用
收藏
页码:951 / 971
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Requisite variety, autopoiesis, and self-organization
    Gershenson, Carlos
    KYBERNETES, 2015, 44 (6-7) : 866 - 873
  • [22] Self-Organization Takes Time Too
    van Rooij, Iris
    TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2012, 4 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [23] Self-organization in Simulated Social Networks
    Leishman, Tania G.
    Green, David G.
    Driver, Sheree
    COMPUTER-MEDIATED SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2009, 5322 : 150 - 156
  • [24] Understanding and Self-Organization
    Newton, Natika W.
    FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11
  • [25] Impact of Self-organization on Tertiary Objectives of Production Planning and Control
    Krockert, Martin
    Matthes, Marvin
    Munkelt, Torsten
    ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, ICEIS 2021, 2022, 455 : 109 - 128
  • [26] Self-Organization in Urban Regeneration: A Two-Case Comparative Research
    van Meerkerk, Ingmar
    Boonstra, Beitske
    Edelenbos, Jurian
    EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2013, 21 (10) : 1630 - 1652
  • [27] MATTER POSSESSES THE FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTY OF SELF-ORGANIZATION
    KURGANOV, BI
    BIOCHEMISTRY-MOSCOW, 1994, 59 (06) : 691 - 692
  • [28] Guiding the self-organization of random Boolean networks
    Gershenson, Carlos
    THEORY IN BIOSCIENCES, 2012, 131 (03) : 181 - 191
  • [29] Chemical self-organization, complexification, and process metaphysics
    Salmon, JF
    CHEMICAL EXPLANATION: CHARACTERISTICS, DEVELOPMENT, AUTONOMY, 2003, 988 : 345 - 352
  • [30] Biological and physical principles in self-organization of brain
    Kroeger, H.
    FRONTIERS OF FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS, 2007, 905 : 168 - 174