Ambulation and complications related to assistive devices after spinal cord injury

被引:22
作者
Saunders, Lee L. [1 ]
Krause, James S. [1 ]
DiPiro, Nicole D. [1 ]
Kraft, Sara [1 ]
Brotherton, Sandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Coll Hlth Profess, Dept Hlth Sci & Res, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Spinal cord injuries; Ambulation; Assistive devices; Pain; Fatigue; Outcomes; Wheelchair; Cane; SEVERE PAIN; WALKING; MOBILITY; INDIVIDUALS; ASSOCIATION; RECOVERY; PEOPLE; INDEPENDENCE; DISABILITY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000082
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate long-term health outcomes including pain intensity, pain interference, and fatigue among ambulatory persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Data were analyzed at a major medical university in the southeast USA. Participants: Participants included 783 ambulatory adults with SCI of traumatic origin, who were at least 1-year post-injury. Participants were identified through three sources of records at a large specialty hospital in the southeastern USA. Interventions: Not applicable. Outcome measures: Pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory) and fatigue (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Abbreviated Version 5). Results: Examining assistive devices used for ambulation, 66% of the population used at least one device. In the logistic model, wheelchair and cane usage were significantly related to the outcomes after controlling for age, gender, and race. Wheelchair usage 50% of the time or less was significantly related to pain intensity (odds ratio (OR) 2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.39-3.03), pain interference (OR 2.11, 95% CI = 1.43-3.12), and fatigue (OR 1.99, 95% CI = 1.12-1.43). Additionally, unilateral cane use was significantly related to the outcomes; pain intensity (OR 1.86, 95% CI = 1.35-2.56), pain interference (OR 2.11, 95% CI = 1.52-2.93), and fatigue (OR 2.49, 95% CI = 1.52-4.08). Conclusions: Among ambulatory persons with SCI, increased pain intensity, pain interference, and fatigue are associated with minimal wheelchair usage (50% or less) and less supportive assistive device (unilateral cane) usage.
引用
收藏
页码:652 / 659
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Comparison of training methods to improve walking in persons with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial [J].
Alexeeva, Natalia ;
Sames, Carol ;
Jacobs, Patrick L. ;
Hobday, Lori ;
DiStasio, Marcello M. ;
Mitchell, Sarah A. ;
Calancie, Blair .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2011, 34 (04) :362-379
[2]   Factors Related to Obstacle Crossing in Independent Ambulatory Patients With Spinal Cord Injury [J].
Amatachaya, Sugalya ;
Thaweewannakij, Thiwaporn ;
Adirek-udomrat, Jutarat ;
Siritaratiwat, Wantana .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2010, 33 (02) :144-149
[3]  
Apple, 2007, TOP SPINAL CORD INJ, V12, P91
[4]  
Barbeau H, 2002, PROG BRAIN RES, V137, P9
[5]   Assistive devices for balance and mobility: Benefits, demands, and adverse consequences [J].
Bateni, H ;
Maki, BE .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (01) :134-145
[6]  
Bowden Mark G, 2008, J Neurol Phys Ther, V32, P129, DOI 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181838291
[7]   Falls in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury [J].
Brotherton, S. S. ;
Krause, J. S. ;
Nietert, P. J. .
SPINAL CORD, 2007, 45 (01) :37-40
[8]   Association between reliance on devices and people for walking and ability to walk community distances among persons with spinal cord injury [J].
Brotherton, Sandra S. ;
Saunders, Lee L. ;
Krause, James S. ;
Morrisette, David C. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2012, 35 (03) :156-161
[9]   Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury [J].
Cardenas, DD ;
Bryce, TN ;
Shem, K ;
Richards, JS ;
Elhefni, H .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (11) :1774-1781
[10]   Fatigue and psychiatric illness in a large community sample of persons with multiple sclerosis [J].
Chwastiak, LA ;
Gibbons, LE ;
Ehde, DM ;
Sullivan, M ;
Bowen, JD ;
Bombardier, CH ;
Kraft, GH .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2005, 59 (05) :291-298