USING ECONOMIC INPUT-OUTPUT LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT TO GUIDE SUSTAINABLE DESIGN

被引:0
作者
Michalek, Jeremy J. [1 ]
Hendrickson, Chris T. [1 ]
Cagan, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2011, VOL 2, PTS A AND B | 2012年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Successful design for the environment (DfE) requires the designer to understand the life cycle impact of design decisions. However, estimating life cycle implications of design choices using traditional process-based life cycle assessment (LCA) is typically too time- and resource-intensive to be practical as part of the design process. We examine the use of economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) as a tool to support sustainable design by helping the designer to quickly determine which aspects of the product dominate its lifetime emissions. Compared to traditional process-based LCA, EIO-LCA produces estimates at a more aggregated level using data on economic transactions and emissions from each sector of the economy. However, EIO-LCA computes full supply chain emissions associated with output from a particular sector in seconds, and for many products these aggregate-level data are sufficient to determine which aspects of the product dominate and to guide sustainable design efforts. We explore two product design examples where a quick scoping exercise with EIO-LCA identifies clear areas of focus for design improvement and innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:951 / 958
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: Multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input-output analysis
    You, Fengqi
    Tao, Ling
    Graziano, Diane J.
    Snyder, Seth W.
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 2012, 58 (04) : 1157 - 1180
  • [22] Disaggregating the Power Generation Sector for Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment
    Algarin, Jorge Vendries
    Hawkins, Troy R.
    Marriott, Joe
    Matthews, H. Scott
    Khanna, Vikas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2015, 19 (04) : 666 - 675
  • [23] A USERS GUIDE TO IO/EAM - AN INPUT-OUTPUT ECONOMIC-ASSESSMENT MODEL
    JORDAN, JL
    BROOKS, R
    LEE, JM
    [J]. GEORGIA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION RESEARCH REPORT, 1985, (468): : 1 - 72
  • [24] Economic and environmental analysis of five Chinese rural toilet technologies based on the economic input-output life cycle assessment
    Gao, Hui
    Zhou, Chuanbin
    Li, Feng
    Han, Baolong
    Li, Xiuxia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 163 : S379 - S391
  • [25] Disassembly system design and analysis with environmental and economic parts selection using life cycle inventory database by input-output tables
    Yamada T.
    Suzuki Y.
    Kinoshita Y.
    Masui T.
    Itsubo N.
    Inoue M.
    [J]. International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing, 2021, 5 (01) : 23 - 43
  • [26] Hybrid input-output life cycle assessment of warm mix asphalt mixtures
    Rodriguez-Alloza, Ana Maria
    Malik, Arunima
    Lenzen, Manfred
    Gallego, Juan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 90 : 171 - 182
  • [27] Carbon footprint accounts of Pakistan: an input-output life cycle assessment model
    Muhammad Zeshan
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 30313 - 30323
  • [28] Representing and visualizing data uncertainty in input-output life cycle assessment models
    Chen, Xiaoju
    Griffin, W. Michael
    Matthews, H. Scott
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 137 : 316 - 325
  • [29] Life Cycle Assessment of an Engine with Input-Output Based Hybrid Analysis Method
    Jiang, Qiuhong
    Li, Tao
    Liu, Zhichao
    Zhang, Hongchao
    Ren, Keda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 78 : 131 - 138
  • [30] An input-output based framework to evaluate human labour in life cycle assessment
    Rugani, Benedetto
    Panasiuk, Daryna
    Benetto, Enrico
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (06) : 795 - 812