The Effect of Strengths-Based Performance Appraisal on Perceived Supervisor Support and the Motivation to Improve Performance

被引:26
作者
van Woerkom, Marianne [1 ,2 ]
Kroon, Brigitte [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Human Resource Studies, Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Ctr Excellence Posit Org Psychol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
performance appraisal; perceived supervisor support; strengths; performance rating; motivation; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; PERSONAL GROWTH; COMMON STEREOTYPES; POSITIVE AFFECT; SOCIAL-CONTEXT; INTERVENTION; FEEDBACK; MEDIATION; RATINGS; BIAS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01883
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Strengths-based performance appraisal focuses on identifying, appreciating, and developing employee's qualities in line with the company goals. Based on self-determination theory (SDT), we hypothesized that strengths-based performance appraisals will bring about a stronger motivation to improve (MTI) performance, by making subordinates feel supported by their supervisor and thereby fulfill their need for relatedness. Moreover, we hypothesized that strengths-based performance appraisal will reduce the threat to the relationship between supervisor and subordinate when the performance rating is relatively low. To investigate our hypotheses, we distributed a questionnaire to employees working for a large Dutch consultancy firm right after their yearly appraisal (N= 422) and linked the questionnaire data to their official performance ratings. Conditional process analysis indicated that strengths-based performance appraisal had a positive effect on perceived supervisor support (PSS), and in turn on MTI performance. Furthermore, the effect of strengths-based performance appraisal was particularly strong, when the performance rating was relatively low. Our findings may inspire future research into strengths-based performance appraisal as a relational approach to employee development.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   Getting Rid of Performance Ratings: Genius or Folly? A Debate [J].
Adler, Seymour ;
Campion, Michael ;
Colquitt, Alan ;
Grubb, Amy ;
Murphy, Kevin ;
Ollander-Krane, Rob ;
Pulakos, Elaine D. .
INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2016, 9 (02) :219-252
[2]   Delivering effective performance feedback: The strengths-based approach [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Gottfredson, Ryan K. ;
Joo, Harry .
BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2012, 55 (02) :105-111
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SAGE HDB HUMAN RESOU
[4]   The emergence of symmetries and asymmetries in performance appraisal interviews: An interactional perspective [J].
Asmuss, Birte .
ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY, 2013, 34 (03) :553-570
[5]  
Asplund J., 2012, The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship, P353
[6]  
Baumeister R., 2001, Review of General Psychology, V5, P323, DOI [DOI 10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323, 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323]
[7]   Posttraumatic stress and growth in student service members and veterans: The role of personal growth initiative [J].
Borowa, Dominika ;
Robitschek, Christine ;
Harmon, Kevin Andrew ;
Shigemoto, Yuki .
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH, 2016, 64 (07) :527-534
[8]  
Boswell W.R., 2000, HUM RESOUR DEV Q, V11, P283
[9]   Strength-based performance appraisal and goal setting [J].
Bouskila-Yam, Osnat ;
Kluger, Avraham N. .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 21 (02) :137-147
[10]  
Buckingham Marcus., 2001, NOW DISCOVER YOUR ST