Inter-hospital comparison of rates of surgical site infection following caesarean section delivery: evaluation of a multicentre surveillance study

被引:50
|
作者
Wilson, J. [1 ]
Wloch, C. [1 ]
Saei, A. [2 ]
McDougall, C. [1 ]
Harrington, P. [1 ]
Charlett, A. [2 ]
Lamagni, T. [1 ]
Elgohari, S. [1 ]
Sheridan, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Protect Agcy, Dept Healthcare Associated Infect & Antimicrobial, London, England
[2] Hlth Protect Agcy, Stat Modelling & Econ Dept, London, England
关键词
Caesarean section; Case-finding; Post-discharge surveillance; Surgical site infection; Surveillance; POSTDISCHARGE SURVEILLANCE; WOUND INFECTIONS; AFTER-DISCHARGE; EXPERIENCE; REDUCTION; ENGLAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2013.01.009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Short postoperative stays following caesarean section delivery make it difficult to assess accurately the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Methods of case-finding that minimize variation are required to support effective surveillance systems, especially where used for benchmarking. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of case-finding methods for SSI following caesarean delivery and their utility in establishing benchmark rates of SSI. Methods: Hospitals conducted surveillance over one or two 13-week periods. Patients were reviewed during their inpatient stay, post partum by community midwives and via patient questionnaire at 30 days post delivery. To estimate the reliability of case-finding methods, case-note reviews were undertaken in a random sample of four hospitals. Findings: A total of 404 SSIs were detected in 4107 caesarean deliveries from 14 hospitals. The median time to SSI was 10 days, 66% were detected in-hospital or by community midwives, and an additional 34% were patient-reported. The rate of SSI was 9.8% but the proportion of patients followed up varied significantly between centres. The estimated sensitivity and specificity of case-finding was 91.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 53.4-98.4] and 98.6% (95% CI: 98.4-98.8), the positive predictive value 91.0% (95% CI: 82.4-96.1) and negative predictive value 98.6% (95% CI: 93.9-99.5). Conclusions: Combined case ascertainment methods are a feasible way to achieve active post-discharge surveillance and had high negative and positive predictive values. Additional SSIs can be detected by patient questionnaires but rates of SSI were strongly influenced by variation in intensity of both healthcare worker- and patient-based case-finding. This factor must be taken into account when comparing or benchmarking rates of SSI. (c) 2013 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 51
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance
    Johnson, A.
    Young, D.
    Reilly, J.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2006, 64 (01) : 30 - 35
  • [2] Risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section in England: results from a multicentre cohort study
    Wloch, C.
    Wilson, J.
    Lamagni, T.
    Harrington, P.
    Charlett, A.
    Sheridan, E.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (11) : 1324 - 1333
  • [3] Enhanced surgical site infection surveillance following caesarean section: experience of a multicentre collaborative post-discharge system
    Ward, V. P.
    Charlett, A.
    Fagan, J.
    Crawshaw, S. C.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2008, 70 (02) : 166 - 173
  • [4] Reliability and validity of using telephone calls for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection following caesarean section at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania
    Nguhuni, Boniface
    De Nardo, Pasquale
    Gentilotti, Elisa
    Chaula, Zainab
    Damian, Caroline
    Mencarini, Paola
    Nicastri, Emanuele
    Fulment, Arnold
    Piscini, Alessandro
    Vairo, Francesco
    Aiken, Alexander M.
    Ippolito, Giuseppe
    ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE AND INFECTION CONTROL, 2017, 6
  • [5] Reliability and validity of using telephone calls for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection following caesarean section at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania
    Boniface Nguhuni
    Pasquale De Nardo
    Elisa Gentilotti
    Zainab Chaula
    Caroline Damian
    Paola Mencarini
    Emanuele Nicastri
    Arnold Fulment
    Alessandro Piscini
    Francesco Vairo
    Alexander M. Aiken
    Giuseppe Ippolito
    Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 6
  • [6] Surgical Site Infection Following Elective Caesarean Section: A Case-Control Study of Post discharge Surveillance
    Griffiths, Jill
    Demianczuk, Nestor
    Cordoviz, Melody
    Joffe, A. Mark
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2005, 27 (04) : 340 - 344
  • [7] The impact of copper impregnated wound dressings on surgical site infection following caesarean section: a double blind randomised controlled study
    Arendsen, Linda P.
    Thakar, R.
    Bassett, P.
    Sultan, A. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 251 : 83 - 88
  • [8] Surgical site infection after caesarean section: space for post-discharge surveillance improvements and reliable comparisons
    Ferraro, Federica
    Piselli, Pierluca
    Pittalis, Silvia
    Ruscitti, Luca E.
    Cimaglia, Claudia
    Ippolito, Giuseppe
    Puro, Vincenzo
    NEW MICROBIOLOGICA, 2016, 39 (02) : 134 - 138
  • [9] Incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection following caesarean section in a Tunisian maternity unit
    Merzougui, Latifa
    Marwen, Nedia
    Hannachi, Hajer
    Asma, Massoudi
    Ben Elhaj, Olfa
    Waddah, Manssouri
    Fatnassi, Ridha
    SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2018, 30 (03): : 339 - 347
  • [10] Postdischarge surveillance following cesarean section: The incidence of surgical site infection and associated factors
    Cardoso del Monte, Meire Celeste
    Pinto Neto, Aarao Mendes
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2010, 38 (06) : 467 - 472