共 50 条
Use of National Asthma Guidelines by Allergists and Pulmonologists: A National Survey
被引:10
|作者:
Cloutier, Michelle M.
[1
]
Akinbami, Lara J.
[2
,3
]
Salo, Paivi M.
[4
]
Schatz, Michael
[5
]
Simoneau, Tregony
[6
]
Wilkerson, Jesse C.
[7
]
Diette, Gregory
[8
]
Elward, Kurtis S.
[9
]
Fuhlbrigge, Anne
[10
]
Mazurek, Jacek M.
[11
]
Feinstein, Lydia
[7
,12
]
Williams, Sonja
[2
]
Zeldin, Darryl C.
[4
]
机构:
[1] UCONN Hlth Farmington, Dept Pediat, Farmington, CT USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Hlth Stat, Hyattsville, MD 20782 USA
[3] US PHS, Rockville, MD USA
[4] NIEHS, Div Intramural Res, NIH, POB 12233, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[5] San Diego Med Ctr, Dept Allergy, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Cambridge, MA USA
[7] Social & Sci Syst, Durham, NC USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[9] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth, Richmond, VA USA
[10] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
[11] NIOSH, Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Morgantown, WV USA
[12] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
Self-efficacy;
Spirometry;
NAEPP;
Agreement;
Inhaler technique;
Asthma treatment plan;
CARE;
MANAGEMENT;
OUTCOMES;
KNOWLEDGE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.026
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
BACKGROUND: Little is known about specialist-specific variations in guideline agreement and adoption. OBJECTIVE: To assess similarities and differences between allergists and pulmonologists in adherence to cornerstone components of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program's Third Expert Panel Report. METHODS: Self-reported guideline agreement, self-efficacy, and adherence were assessed in allergists (n [ 134) and pulmonologists (n = 99) in the 2012 National Asthma Survey of Physicians. Multivariate models were used to assess if physician and practice characteristics explained bivariate associations between specialty and "almost always" adhering to recommendations (ie, >= 75% of the time). RESULTS: Allergists and pulmonologists reported high guideline self-efficacy and moderate guideline agreement. Both groups "almost always" assessed asthma control (66.2%, standard error [SE] 4.3), assessed school/work asthma triggers (71.3%, SE, 3.9), and endorsed inhaled corticosteroids use (95.5%, SE 2.0). Repeated assessment of the inhaler technique, use of asthma action/treatment plans, and spirometry were lower (39.7%, SE 4.0; 30.6%, SE 3.6; 44.7%, SE 4.1, respectively). Compared with pulmonologists, more allergists almost always performed spirometry (56.6% vs 38.6%, P = .06), asked about nighttime awakening (91.9% vs 76.5%, P = .03) and emergency department visits (92.2% vs 76.5%, P = .03), assessed home triggers (70.5% vs 52.6%, P = .06), and performed allergy testing (61.8% vs 21.3%, P <.001). In multivariate analyses, practice-specific characteristics explained differences except for allergy testing. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, allergists and pulmonologists adhere to the asthma guidelines with notable exceptions, including asthma action plan use and inhaler technique assessment. Recommendations with low implementation offer opportunities for further exploration and could serve as targets for increasing guideline uptake. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
引用
收藏
页码:3011 / +
页数:12
相关论文