Case-matched comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

被引:33
作者
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Chen, Ke [2 ]
Xu, Xiao-Wu [2 ]
Pan, Yu [2 ]
Mou, Yi-Ping [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Shaoxing Hosp, Shaoxing Peoples Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Stomach neoplasms; Gastrectomy; Laparoscopy; Survival; Case matched study; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPEN SUBTOTAL GASTRECTOMY; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; MULTICENTER; RECURRENCE; RESECTION;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v19.i23.3672
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed by comparing the outcomes of 54 patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with those of 54 patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy (ODG) between October 2004 and October 2007. The patients' demographic data (age and gender), date of surgery, extent of lymphadenectomy, and differentiation and tumor-node-metastasis stage of the tumor were examined. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery, complications, pathological findings, and follow-up data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LADG group than in the ODG group (259.3 +/- 46.2 min vs 199.8 +/- 40.85 min; P < 0.05), whereas intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were significantly lower (160.2 +/- 85.9 mL vs 257.8 +/- 151.0 mL; 13.0% vs 24.1%, respectively, P < 0.05). In addition, the time to first flatus, time to initiate oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the LADG group than in the ODG group (3.9 +/- 1.4 d vs 4.4 +/- 1.5 d; 4.6 +/- 1.2 d vs 5.6 +/- 2.1 d; and 9.5 +/- 2.7 d vs 11.1 +/- 4.1 d, respectively; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the LADG group and ODG group with regard to the number of harvested lymph nodes. The median follow-up was 60 mo (range, 5-97 mo). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 94.3%, 90.2%, and 76.7%, respectively, in the LADG group and 89.5%, 84.7%, and 82.3%, respectively, in the ODG group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 98.0%, 91.9%, and 81.1%, respectively, in the LADG group and 91.5%, 86.9%, and 82.1%, respectively, in the ODG group. There was no signi.cant difference between the two groups with regard to the survival rate. CONCLUSION: LADG is suitable and minimally invasive for treating distal gastric cancer and can achieve similar long-term results to ODG. (C) 2013 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3672 / 3677
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer
    Bamboat, Zubin M.
    Strong, Vivian E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 107 (03) : 271 - 276
  • [2] Laparoscopy-assisted versus open D2 radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer without serosal invasion: a case control study
    Chen, Qi-Yue
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    Lin, Jian-Xian
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    Li, Ping
    Xie, Jian-Wei
    Wang, Jia-Bin
    Lu, Jun
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 10
  • [3] Comparative Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted versus Open Subtotal Gastrectomy for pT2 Gastric Cancer
    Chun, Hyun-Tae
    Kim, Ki-Han
    Kim, Min-Chan
    Jung, Ghap-Joong
    [J]. YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (05) : 952 - 959
  • [4] D2 dissection in laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Cui, Ming
    Xing, Jia-Di
    Yang, Wei
    Ma, Yi-Yuan
    Yao, Zhen-Dan
    Zhang, Nan
    Su, Xiang-Qian
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (08) : 833 - 839
  • [5] Patterns of initial recurrence in completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma
    D'Angelica, M
    Gonen, M
    Brennan, MF
    Turnbull, AD
    Bains, M
    Karpeh, MS
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (05) : 808 - 816
  • [6] Laparoscopic and open gastric resections for malignant lesions - A prospective, comparative study
    Dulucq, JL
    Wintringer, P
    Stabilini, C
    Solinas, L
    Perissat, J
    Mahajna, A
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (07): : 933 - 938
  • [7] Comparison of long-term results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer
    Hamabe, Atsushi
    Omori, Takeshi
    Tanaka, Koji
    Nishida, Toshirou
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06): : 1702 - 1709
  • [8] Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy Compared to Open Distal Gastrectomy in Early Gastric Cancer
    Han, Jae-Hong
    Lee, Hyuk-Joon
    Suh, Yun-Suhk
    Han, Dong-Seok
    Kong, Seong-Ho
    Yang, Han-Kwang
    [J]. DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 28 (04) : 245 - 251
  • [9] Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer - Five-year results of a randomized prospective trial
    Huscher, CGS
    Mingoli, A
    Sgarzini, G
    Sansonetti, A
    Di Paola, M
    Recher, A
    Ponzano, C
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 241 (02) : 232 - 237
  • [10] Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer
    Hwang, Sang Il
    Kim, Hyung Ook
    Yoo, Chang Hak
    Shin, Jun Ho
    Son, Byung Ho
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (06): : 1252 - 1258