Local-Scale Cereal Yield Forecasting in Italy: Lessons from Different Statistical Models and Spatial Aggregations

被引:6
作者
Garcia-Leon, David [1 ]
Lopez-Lozano, Raul [2 ]
Toreti, Andrea [3 ]
Zampieri, Matteo [3 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, Edificio Expo,Inca Garcilaso 3, Seville 41092, Spain
[2] Avignon Univ, UMT CAPTE, UMR EMMAH, INRAE, 228 Route Aerodrome CS 40509, F-84914 Avignon 9, France
[3] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 06期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
crop yield forecasting; cereals; statistical models; lasso; ridge; elastic net; DROUGHT INDEXES; ERA-INTERIM; WHEAT; PRODUCTS;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy10060809
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Statistical, data-driven methods are considered good alternatives to process-based models for the sub-national monitoring of cereal crop yields, since they can flexibly handle large datasets and can be calibrated simultaneously to different areas. Here, we assess the influence of several characteristics on the ability of these methods to forecast cereal yields at the local scale. We look at two diverse agro-climatic Italian regions and analyze the most relevant types of cereal crops produced (wheat, barley, maize and rice). Models of different complexity levels are built for all species by considering six meteorological and remote sensing indicators as candidate predictive variables. Yield data at three different spatial aggregation scales were retrieved from a comprehensive, farm-level dataset over the period 2001-2015. Overall, our results suggest the better predictability of summer crops compared to winter crops, irrespective of the model considered, reflecting a more intricate relationship among winter cereals, their physiology and weather patterns. At higher spatial resolutions, more sophisticated modelling techniques resting on feature selection from multiple indicators outperformed more parsimonious linear models. These gains, however, vanished as data were further aggregated spatially, with the predictive ability of all competing models converging at the agricultural district and province levels. Feature-selection models tended to elicit more satellite-based than meteorological indicators, with a preference for temperature indicators in summer crops, whereas variables describing the water content of the soil/plant were more often selected in winter crops. The selected features were, in general, equally distributed along the plant growing cycle.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, HARMONIE reanalysis report of results and dataset. UERRA deliverable D2.7
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ITAL J AGRON, DOI DOI 10.4081/IJA.2012.E2
[4]   How well do meteorological indicators represent agricultural and forest drought across Europe? [J].
Bachmair, S. ;
Tanguy, M. ;
Hannaford, J. ;
Stahl, K. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (03)
[5]   Weather conditions associated with irrigated crops in an arid and semi arid environment [J].
Bannayan, Mohammad ;
Sanjani, Sara .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2011, 151 (12) :1589-1598
[6]   GEOV1: LAI and FAPAR essential climate variables and FCOVER global time series capitalizing over existing products. Part1: Principles of development and production [J].
Baret, F. ;
Weiss, M. ;
Lacaze, R. ;
Camacho, F. ;
Makhmara, H. ;
Pacholcyzk, P. ;
Smets, B. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 137 :299-309
[7]  
Baruth B, 2007, 22936 EUR EN OPOCE
[8]  
Basso B., 2013, P 1 M SCI ADV COMM G, P18, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[9]   Identifying indicators for extreme wheat and maize yield losses [J].
Ben-Ari, Tamara ;
Adrian, Juliette ;
Klein, Tommy ;
Calanca, Pierluigi ;
Van der Velde, Marijn ;
Makowski, David .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2016, 220 :130-140
[10]   Satellite-based vegetation health indices as a criteria for insuring against drought-related yield losses [J].
Bokusheva, R. ;
Kogan, F. ;
Vitkovskaya, I. ;
Conradt, S. ;
Batyrbayeva, M. .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2016, 220 :200-206