Machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser Doppler flowmetry

被引:22
作者
Fredriksson, Ingemar [1 ,2 ]
Hultman, Martin [1 ]
Stromberg, Tomas [1 ]
Larsson, Marcus [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Perimed AB, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
blood flow; microcirculation; laser speckle contrast analysis; artificial neural networks; SIZE;
D O I
10.1117/1.JBO.24.1.016001
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) enables video rate imaging of blood flow. However, its relation to tissue blood perfusion is nonlinear and depends strongly on exposure time. By contrast, the perfusion estimate from the slower laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) technique has a relationship to blood perfusion that is better understood. Multiexposure LSCI (MELSCI) enables a perfusion estimate closer to the actual perfusion than that using a single exposure time. We present and evaluate a method that utilizes contrasts from seven exposure times between 1 and 64 ms to calculate a perfusion estimate that resembles the perfusion estimate from LDF. The method is based on artificial neural networks (ANN) for fast and accurate processing of MELSCI contrasts to perfusion. The networks are trained using modeling of Doppler histograms and speckle contrasts from tissue models. The importance of accounting for noise is demonstrated. Results show that by using ANN, MELSCI data can be processed to LDF perfusion with high accuracy, with a correlation coefficient R = 1.000 for noise-free data, R = 0.993 when a moderate degree of noise is present, and R = 0.995 for in vivo data from an occlusion-release experiment. (C) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Blood Perfusion Values of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging and Laser Doppler Flowmetry: Is a Direct Comparison Possible? [J].
Binzoni, Tiziano ;
Humeau-Heurtier, Anne ;
Abraham, Pierre ;
Mahe, Guillaume .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 60 (05) :1259-1265
[2]   Laser speckle contrast imaging: theoretical and practical limitations [J].
Briers, David ;
Duncan, Donald D. ;
Hirst, Evan ;
Kirkpatrick, Sean J. ;
Larsson, Marcus ;
Steenbergen, Wiendelt ;
Stromberg, Tomas ;
Thompson, Oliver B. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2013, 18 (06)
[3]  
Briers J D, 1996, J Biomed Opt, V1, P174, DOI 10.1117/12.231359
[4]   PHOTOELECTRIC MIXING AS A SPECTROSCOPIC TOOL [J].
FORRESTER, A .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1961, 51 (03) :253-&
[5]   Optical microcirculatory skin model:: assessed by Monte Carlo simulations paired with in vivo laser Doppler flowmetry [J].
Fredriksson, Ingemar ;
Larsson, Marcus ;
Stromberg, Tomas .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2008, 13 (01)
[6]   Vessel packaging effect in laser speckle contrast imaging and laser Doppler imaging [J].
Fredriksson, Ingemar ;
Larsson, Marcus .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2017, 22 (10)
[7]   On the equivalence and differences between laser Doppler flowmetry and laser speckle contrast analysis [J].
Fredriksson, Ingemar ;
Larsson, Marcus .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2016, 21 (12)
[8]   Inverse Monte Carlo in a multilayered tissue model: merging diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and laser Doppler flowmetry [J].
Fredriksson, Ingemar ;
Burdakov, Oleg ;
Larsson, Marcus ;
Stromberg, Tomas .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2013, 18 (12)
[9]   Model-based quantitative laser Doppler flowmetry in skin [J].
Fredriksson, Ingemar ;
Larsson, Marcus ;
Stromberg, Tomas .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2010, 15 (05)
[10]   Evaluation of a high framerate multi-exposure laser speckle contrast imaging setup [J].
Hultman, Martin ;
Fredriksson, Ingemar ;
Stromberg, Tomas ;
Larsson, Marcus .
HIGH-SPEED BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND SPECTROSCOPY III: TOWARD BIG DATA INSTRUMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 10505